Balancing the Multiple Objectives of Conservation Programs
- by Andrea Cattaneo, Daniel Hellerstein, Cynthia Nickerson and Christina Myers
- 5/31/2006
Overview
Many of the Nation's conservation programs use an index approach to prioritize environmental and cost objectives. In an index, objectives are weighted by relative importance. This report provides empirical evidence on the cost and environmental benefit tradeoffs of different weighting schemes in USDA's Conservation Reserve Program and considers how different weighting schemes encourage different sets of landowners to offer land for enrollment. The report finds that while small changes in index weights do not markedly affect levels of environmental benefits that can be achieved at a national level, larger changes can have a moderate impact.
Download
-
Full Report
Download (PDF, 2.05 MB) -
Report Summary
Download (PDF, 142.46 KB) -
Abstract, Acknowledgments, Contents, and Summary
Download (PDF, 212.53 KB) -
Summary
Download (PDF, 58.27 KB) -
Introduction
Download (PDF, 75.61 KB) -
Indices in a Multi-Objective Program: Experience and Design in U.S. Conservation Programs
Download (PDF, 168.42 KB) -
The CRP Balancing Act: The Sensitivity of CRP Outcomes to Changes in EBI Weights
Download (PDF, 556.35 KB) -
Conclusions
Download (PDF, 63.74 KB) -
References
Download (PDF, 51.87 KB) -
Appendix A: Balancing Multiple Objectives in U.S. Conservation Programs: Indices and Beyond
Download (PDF, 1.24 MB) -
Appendix B: Modeling Participation Effects From Changing EBI Weights
Download (PDF, 64.51 KB)
We’d welcome your feedback!
Would you be willing to answer a few quick questions about your experience?