Policy Options to Stabilize Food Supplies: A Case Study of Southern Africa
- by Michael Trueblood, Shahla Shapouri and Shida Henneberry
- 6/18/2001
Overview
For the southern Africa region, both a grain stocking program and an import insurance program would have reduced food supply variability more than historical food aid during 1970-95. The stocking program and the import insurance program would have been less expensive than food aid from a donor point of view. These options may be attractive policy alternatives for donors and countries in other regions, given the decline in food aid budgets in recent years and projections of rising global food gaps.
Download
-
Full Report
Download (PDF, 254.68 KB) -
Abstract
Download (PDF, 62.27 KB) -
Contents
Download (PDF, 43.05 KB) -
Summary
Download (PDF, 45.21 KB) -
Introduction
Download (PDF, 95.29 KB) -
Background: Food Security in Southern Africa
Download (PDF, 138.47 KB) -
Regional Grain Stock Program
Download (PDF, 138.83 KB) -
Regional Grain Import Insurance Program
Download (PDF, 138.57 KB) -
Would These Programs Be as Effective as Food Aid in Stabilizing Grain Supplies?
Download (PDF, 137.47 KB) -
Would These Programs Be More Cost Effective than Food Aid?
Download (PDF, 128.5 KB) -
Conclusions
Download (PDF, 69.98 KB) -
References
Download (PDF, 68.93 KB)
We’d welcome your feedback!
Would you be willing to answer a few quick questions about your experience?