Documentation
Documentation for the Agricultural Resource Management Survey
(ARMS) below consists of:
General Documentation
Sponsored jointly by ERS and the National Agricultural
Statistics Service (NASS), ARMS began in 1996 as a synthesis of the
former USDA cropping practice, chemical use, and farm costs and
returns surveys, which dated back to 1975.
ARMS is a series of interviews with farm operators about their
farm business and household. It is conducted annually in three
phases over the course of the survey year, which runs from June
through April. The ARMS data collection starts during the fall when
production practice and cost data are collected, and finishes in
the spring when a follow-on interview collects data about
whole-farm costs like overhead, interest, and taxes.
Phase I, conducted during the summer of the
reference year:
Farmers selected for inclusion in the survey sample are screened
to verify their operating status and to determine whether they are
producing commodities targeted for data collection. This first
phase is merely a screening questionnaire used to improve survey
efficiency; it does not contribute to the user data files.
Phase II, conducted in the fall and winter of
the reference year:
Randomly selected operating farms from Phase I are interviewed to
collect information on their production practices and chemical use.
Phase II mirrors the former Cropping Practices Survey. Phase II
data are collected at the individual field or production unit
level. Phase II is a series of commodity surveys conducted to
obtain physical and economic data on production inputs, management
practices, and commodity cost of production.
Phase III, conducted in the spring of the year
following the reference year:
A nationally representative sample of farmers is interviewed to
obtain information on their costs and returns during the reference
year. Farmers that reported production practices for specific
commodities in Phase II are also contacted to obtain information on
their costs and returns, including data needed to estimate the
costs of production associated with their production practices.
Phase III data are collected at the whole farm level. Phase III is
designed to represent all U.S. farms and focuses on farm income and
expenditures, farm financial arrangements, and other
characteristics of the farm business and farm household.
The phase II and III components are related, in that the
operators are asked to complete both interviews--but only when
designed to prepare a crop cost of production estimate. The cost of
production estimates include the enterprise share of farm business
expense items such as land taxes, insurance, fuel expenses, etc.
that are collected in the phase III interviews.

Sample Design
The ARMS survey is technically described as a multi-phase,
multi-frame, stratified, probability-weighted sampling design. What
do these three characteristics of the sample design mean?
Multiframe
NASS uses two sampling frames to select farms for the
survey:
- The primary sample is derived from the NASS List Frame. NASS
maintains a list of farm operations that exhibit certain
characteristics. The lists are constructed and maintained from many
different sources, including the Census of Agriculture and other
NASS surveys. Because some information is already known about these
farms, the list can be sorted according to farm types and size
classes.
- The second sampling frame for ARMS is the NASS Area Frame. This
is used only to capture farms not on the List Frame, and consists
of randomly selected agricultural land segments that represent all
land in farms. Each year, NASS conducts a spring survey selected
from the Area Frame to estimate crop acreage and land use. This
survey identifies all land uses within the segment, and it can be
used to stratify target crops for follow-on surveys. A sample for
ARMS is then selected from the spring survey results. Only those
farms not on the List Frame (nonoverlap) are retained for
sampling.
Stratified
Strata are divisions within the sample frames that have
particular characteristics. Farms in different strata are sampled
with a different probability of selection. Within a stratum, the
weight (expansion factor) is based on the probability of its
selection. In the Area Frame, land use or crop type can be used to
stratify target crops for follow-up surveys.
Probability-weighted
Because of the complexity of the sample design, each observation
has a different weight, or expansion factor, to reflect its
probability of selection and, therefore, what part of the sampled
universe it should represent. Appropriate sample weights (expansion
factors) are provided to prepare population estimates from the
survey results. Population estimates are constructed by weighting
each sample with the appropriate expansion factor. A jackknife
re-sampling process was used with 15 additional weights from NASS
for each sample to estimate the Relative Standard Error (RSE) for
each data item.
Furthermore, data from the Phase II of ARMS is divided into
three data files: 1) fertilizers, 2) pesticides, and 3) all other
data designated as the main file (e.g., field characteristics,
management practices, and production input data other than
fertilizers and pesticides). Sample weights associated with each of
the three data files depends on the number of usable responses for
the respective parts of the Phase II questionnaire. The usability
of these tables for the construction of chemical or fertilizer use
estimates was determined independently from the completion of the
remainder of the questionnaire. Typically, there are slightly
different response rates for these three parts of the
questionnaire, and hence, weights differ between the main file and
the two sub-files (pesticide and fertilizer). Cross-tabbing of
variables across the three data files can result in different
population estimates for the same variable. In general, such
population estimate differences across tables are minimal.
Data Collection
Trained enumerators conduct personal interviews, using
questionnaires developed by NASS and ERS, with farm operators to
collect data about their farm operations for the ARMS survey. An
interviewer's manual outlines detailed enumeration procedures for
each phase of the survey. These documents provide specific
directions on how the interview is to be conducted and insight into
how to interpret each question.
Quality Control
NASS provides enumerator training prior to the survey
through a series of enumerator workshops. NASS Headquarters and ERS
provide training materials to the State survey statisticians who
conduct the training.
After questionnaires are completed by the enumerators, each
questionnaire is reviewed by supervisory enumerators for
completeness, inconsistent responses, or errors, and then
transferred to a NASS State office. Supervisory statisticians also
review each questionnaire before it is keyed into an electronic
format. A computerized edit routine is then used to identify other
potential errors or inconsistencies, checking that responses fall
within expected ranges and that answers are consistent. When
responses are anomalous, State survey statisticians investigate and
either correct or verify the responses. A survey administration
manual provides specific details about survey administration and
data processing procedures.
Source, Content, and Coverage
ARMS is an ongoing program surveying U.S. farms in the 48
contiguous States and covering specific commodities on a rotating
basis.
Farms
ARMS data are collected at both the individual field or production
unit level (Phase II), and for the whole farm (Phase III). The
exact questions asked vary with the type of crop or livestock
enterprise being sampled. Download the Survey to see
the questions asked for Phases II and III for specific crops and
livestock in specific years.
The target population for ARMS is the official USDA farm
population in the 48 contiguous States, which is defined as all
establishments, except institutional farms, that sold or would
normally have sold at least $1,000 of agricultural products during
the year.
Commodities
Commodity-specific information is collected on a rotating basis in
both the field-level (Phase II) and whole-farm (Phase III) portions
of the ARMS. Production practice data for major crop and livestock
activities (corn, soybeans, wheat, cotton, dairy, and hogs) are
gathered more often than that for other commodities (other feed
grains, other small grains, sugarbeets, rice, peanuts, tobacco, and
poultry). Livestock data (cow-calf, hogs, and dairy) have been
collected approximately every 5 years, on a staggered rotation.
States
The States included in the survey each year vary, depending on
the crops surveyed and to help minimize respondent burden.
Field-level data collected in ARMS Phase II surveys do not
represent the total U.S. acreage of each crop surveyed, but
generally represent over 90 percent of acreage and production of
the target commodity. The sampling used in ARMS Phase II was not
intended to support State estimates, but sufficient data were
obtained in many States to report these estimates. However, the
ability to partition data for individual States is very
limited.
|
States surveyed
by commodity and year
|
| Apples |
| 2007 |
CA |
MI |
NY |
NC |
OR |
PA |
WA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Corn |
| 1996 |
|
|
IL |
IN |
IA |
KS |
KY |
MI |
MN |
MO |
NE |
|
NC |
|
OH |
PA |
SC |
SD |
TX |
WI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1997 |
|
|
IL |
IN |
IA |
|
|
MI |
MN |
MO |
NE |
|
|
|
OH |
|
|
SD |
|
WI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1998 |
CO |
|
IL |
IN |
IA |
KS |
KY |
MI |
MN |
MO |
NE |
|
NC |
|
OH |
PA |
|
SD |
TX |
WI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1999 |
CO |
|
IL |
IN |
IA |
KS |
KY |
MI |
MN |
MO |
NE |
|
NC |
|
OH |
|
|
SD |
TX |
WI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2000 |
CO |
|
IL |
IN |
IA |
KS |
KY |
MI |
MN |
MO |
NE |
NY |
NC |
ND |
OH |
PA |
|
SD |
TX |
WI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2001 |
CO |
GA |
IL |
IN |
IA |
KS |
KY |
MI |
MN |
MO |
NE |
NY |
NC |
ND |
OH |
PA |
|
SD |
TX |
WI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2005 |
CO |
GA |
IL |
IN |
IA |
KS |
KY |
MI |
MN |
MO |
NE |
NY |
NC |
ND |
OH |
PA |
|
SD |
TX |
WI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2010 |
CO |
GA |
IL |
IN |
IA |
KS |
KY |
MI |
MN |
MO |
NE |
NY |
NC |
ND |
OH |
PA |
SC |
SD |
TX |
WI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cotton
|
| 1996 |
|
AZ |
AR |
CA |
GA |
LA |
MS |
|
|
|
TN |
TX |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1997 |
AL |
AZ |
AR |
CA |
GA |
LA |
MS |
MO |
NC |
SC |
TN |
TX |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1998 |
AL |
AZ |
AR |
CA |
GA |
LA |
MS |
|
NC |
|
TN |
TX |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1999 |
AL |
AZ |
AR |
CA |
GA |
LA |
MS |
|
NC |
|
TN |
TX |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2000 |
AL |
AZ |
AR |
CA |
GA |
LA |
MS |
MO |
NC |
|
TN |
TX |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2003 |
AL |
AZ |
AR |
CA |
GA |
LA |
MS |
MO |
NC |
SC |
TN |
TX |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2007 |
AL |
|
AR |
CA |
GA |
LA |
MS |
MO |
NC |
SC |
TN |
TX |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Soybeans |
| 1996 |
AR |
|
IL |
IN |
IA |
|
|
LA |
|
|
MN |
MS |
MO |
NE |
|
|
OH |
|
|
TN |
|
WI |
|
|
|
|
| 1997 |
AR |
DE |
IL |
IN |
IA |
KS |
KY |
LA |
|
MI |
MN |
MS |
MO |
NE |
NC |
|
OH |
PA |
SD |
TN |
|
WI |
|
|
|
|
| 1998 |
AR |
|
IL |
IN |
IA |
KS |
KY |
LA |
|
MI |
MN |
MS |
MO |
NE |
NC |
|
OH |
|
SD |
TN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1999 |
AR |
|
IL |
IN |
IA |
KS |
KY |
LA |
|
MI |
MN |
MS |
MO |
NE |
NC |
|
OH |
PA |
SD |
TN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2000 |
AR |
|
IL |
IN |
IA |
KS |
KY |
LA |
|
MI |
MN |
MS |
MO |
NE |
NC |
ND |
OH |
|
SD |
TN |
|
WI |
|
|
|
|
| 2002 |
AR |
|
IL |
IN |
IA |
KS |
KY |
LA |
MD |
MI |
MN |
MS |
MO |
NE |
NC |
ND |
OH |
|
SD |
TN |
VA |
WI |
|
|
|
|
| 2006 |
AR |
|
IL |
IN |
IA |
KS |
KY |
LA |
|
MI |
MN |
MS |
MO |
NE |
NC |
ND |
OH |
|
SD |
TN |
VA |
WI |
|
|
|
|
| Durum
Wheat |
| 1996 |
|
|
ND |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1997 |
|
|
ND |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1998 |
CA |
MT |
ND |
SD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2000 |
|
|
ND |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2004 |
|
MT |
ND |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2009 |
ID |
MT |
ND |
SD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Other Spring
Wheat |
| 1996 |
|
|
MN |
MT |
ND |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1997 |
|
|
MN |
MT |
ND |
|
SD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1998 |
|
ID |
MN |
MT |
ND |
OR |
SD |
WA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2000 |
|
|
MN |
MT |
ND |
|
SD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2004 |
|
ID |
MN |
MT |
ND |
OR |
SD |
WA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2009 |
CO |
ID |
MN |
MT |
ND |
OR |
SD |
WA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Winter
Wheat |
| 1996 |
|
|
CO |
DE |
|
ID |
|
KS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
MT |
NE |
|
|
OK |
OR |
|
SD |
|
|
TX |
WA |
| 1997 |
|
|
CO |
|
|
ID |
IL |
KS |
|
|
|
|
|
MO |
MT |
NE |
|
OH |
OK |
OR |
PA |
SD |
|
|
TX |
WA |
| 1998 |
|
CA |
CO |
|
GA |
ID |
IL |
KS |
|
LA |
|
MN |
MS |
MO |
MT |
NE |
NC |
OH |
OK |
OR |
|
SD |
|
|
TX |
WA |
| 2000 |
AR |
|
CO |
|
|
ID |
IL |
KS |
KY |
|
|
|
|
MO |
MT |
NE |
NC |
OH |
OK |
OR |
|
SD |
|
|
TX |
WA |
| 2004 |
|
|
CO |
|
|
ID |
IL |
KS |
|
|
MI |
|
|
MO |
MT |
NE |
|
OH |
OK |
OR |
|
SD |
|
|
TX |
WA |
| 2009 |
|
|
CO |
|
|
ID |
IL |
KS |
|
|
MI |
MN |
|
MO |
MT |
NE |
ND |
OH |
OK |
OR |
|
SD |
|
|
TX |
WA |
| Peanuts |
| 1999 |
AL |
|
GA |
NC |
TX |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2004 |
AL |
FL |
GA |
NC |
TX |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Potatoes |
| 1996 |
|
ID |
|
ME |
|
|
|
|
|
WA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1997 |
|
ID |
|
ME |
|
MN |
ND |
OR |
|
WA |
WI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1999 |
CO |
ID |
IN |
ME |
MI |
MN |
ND |
OR |
PA |
WA |
WI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Rice |
| 2000 |
AR |
CA |
LA |
MS |
|
TX |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2006 |
AR |
CA |
LA |
MS |
MO |
TX |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Sugarbeets |
| 2000 |
CA |
CO |
ID |
MI |
MN |
MT |
NE |
ND |
OR |
WA |
WY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Sunflowers |
| 1999 |
KS |
ND |
SD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Oats |
| 2005 |
IL |
IA |
KS |
MI |
MN |
NE |
NY |
ND |
PA |
SD |
TX |
WI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Barley |
| 2003 |
CA |
ID |
MN |
MT |
ND |
PA |
SD |
WA |
WI |
WY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Sorghum |
| 2003 |
CO |
KS |
MO |
NE |
OK |
SD |
TX |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Flue-cured Tobacco |
| 1996 |
GA |
NC |
SC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Cow-calf |
| 1996 |
CA |
CO |
FL |
ID |
IL |
KS |
KY |
LA |
MO |
MT |
NE |
NM |
ND |
OK |
OR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Hogs |
| 1998 |
AL |
AR |
CO |
GA |
IL |
IN |
IA |
KS |
KY |
MI |
MN |
MO |
NE |
NC |
OH |
OK |
SC |
SD |
TN |
UT |
VA |
WI |
|
|
|
|
| 2004 |
|
AR |
CO |
GA |
IL |
IN |
IA |
KS |
KY |
MI |
MN |
MO |
NE |
NC |
OH |
OK |
PA |
SD |
|
|
VA |
WI |
|
|
|
|
| Dairy |
| 2000 |
AZ |
CA |
|
FL |
GA |
ID |
IL |
IN |
IA |
|
KY |
|
MI |
MN |
MO |
NM |
NY |
OH |
|
PA |
TN |
TX |
VT |
VA |
WA |
WI |
| 2005 |
AZ |
CA |
|
FL |
GA |
ID |
IL |
IN |
IA |
|
KY |
|
MI |
MN |
MO |
NM |
NY |
OH |
|
PA |
TN |
TX |
VT |
VA |
WA |
WI |
| 2010 |
AZ |
CA |
CO |
FL |
GA |
ID |
IL |
IN |
IA |
KS |
KY |
ME |
MI |
MN |
MO |
NM |
NY |
OH |
OR |
PA |
TN |
TX |
VT |
VA |
WA |
WI |
Documentation Specific to
Farm Structure and Finance
USDA's Economic Research Service and National Agricultural
Statistics Service (NASS) have surveyed farmers to obtain
information about farm financial conditions and production
practices since 1975. Beginning in 1996, standard financial
statements (income statement, balance sheet, financial ratios) as
well as structural characteristics are summarized annually for
various classifications of farms, such as farm type, sales class,
region, operator age, and a seven-category farm typology and a
three-category typology (rural residence, intermediate and
commercial farms) as part of the Agricultural Resource Management
Survey (ARMS).
Scope/Coverage
Data used to develop information about farms, farm operators,
and farm operator households are collected in the annual ARMS
surveys of U.S. farms. There are multiple versions of the ARMS each
year, including whole-farm and commodity production practice and
cost versions. Each production practice and cost version gathers
detailed information about input use, field operations, and
production costs of a particular commodity. Data are collected by
personal interviews with farmers and by mail (beginning in 2003)
using questionnaires developed by NASS and ERS.
The ARMS data collection starts during the fall when crop
production practice and cost data are collected, and finishes in
the spring with collection of whole farm and livestock production
practice and cost data.
Data collected for the whole farm include operating
characteristics, production practices, farm business financial
information, and information the farm operator's household, such as
off-farm income. Financial information includes receipts from crop
and livestock sales, production contracts, and government payments.
Data are collected on expenses incurred in operating the farm,
including the inputs necessary for crop and livestock production,
and general farm business expenses, including repairs and
maintenance, taxes, insurance and rent, and utilities that cannot
be associated with a specific farm enterprise. Information on
assets used in the farm operation (including those assets that are
owned and those not wholly owned but operated by the farm) and
liabilities incurred in operating the farm is also collected. In
addition data on nonfarm and farm-related income, and nonfarm
assets are collected for the farm operator's household.
Summary data on farm structure and farm businesses and their
finances are available for production years beginning in 1996.
Estimates of sector business and financial data include national
and State income estimates and asset, debt, and balance sheet
data.
Farm-Level Land Use and Tenure
Land-use and tenure data collected for the whole farm differ
from data collected in Phase II at the field level. Each crop
enterprise is recorded here, as are the details of crop use,
tenure, rental arrangements, production, and program
participation.

Farm Business Income
Also recorded at the whole-farm level are data needed to capture
sources of income coming to the farm. These include obvious items
like receipts from crop and livestock sales, production contracts,
and government payments, but also unusual or episodic receipts,
such as machine hire or custom work, sale of machinery or
equipment, and income from activities in the previous year. Home
consumption of goods produced on the farm allows adjustments to
income to be made. In addition to the total amount of receipts,
their distribution to all those with an interest in the farm
business is also recorded.

Farm Business Expense
Data on expenses incurred in operating the farm across all
enterprises (beyond the expenses recorded for any fields surveyed
in Phase II) are collected in ARMS Phase III.
In addition to the inputs necessary for crop production, such as
are collected at the field level, Phase III collects data on
repairs and maintenance, taxes, insurance and rent, and utilities
that cannot be associated with a specific farm enterprise. Data on
capital improvements are also recorded.

Farm Business Finances
Financial attributes of the farm are collected in ARMS Phase
III. These include three general categories of data: (1)
information on assets used in the farm operation (including those
assets that are owned and those not wholly owned but operated by
the farm), (2) liabilities incurred in operating the farm, and (3)
information on the owners of all types of assets. The distributions
of ownership are needed to match the distributions of income
flowing from the operation.

Farm Households
Data on farm households, encompassing both the farm business and
other economic activity engaged in by farm household members, are
reported in the Farm and Operator Households: Structure and
Finance, and the Featured States sections of this tool. Information
on detailed farm and household types is classified within the ERS
Farm Typology.
Methodology
Each farm sampled in the ARMS represents a known number of farms
with similar attributes, so that weighting the data for each farm
by the number of farms it represents provides a basis for
calculating estimates for the target population. Whole-farm survey
weights are adjusted to provide coverage of official USDA farm
numbers at the national and regional levels. The weights have also
been adjusted to provide coverage of official USDA estimates of the
production of major crops and livestock. The target population for
the whole-farm survey is all U.S. farms in the 48 contiguous
States. A farm is defined as any place from which $1,000 or more of
agricultural products (crops and livestock) were sold or normally
would have been sold during the survey year.
The financial information was prepared based on the accounting
methods recommended by the Farm Financial Standards Council. In
addition, selected financial information including farm operator
household income, is provided for farm operator households and
family farms.
Documentation Specific to
Crop Production Practices
Crop Production Practices is a data file based on information
collected through a series of annual field-level commodity surveys.
Also known as Phase II of the Agricultural Resource Management
Survey (ARMS), this series is USDA's primary source of information
about the current status and trends in crop production practices
for several large-acreage field crops. This survey also obtains
data on U.S. farmers' agricultural resource use, as well as data to
assess potential environmental impacts associated with crop
production practices. Crop Production Practices data also
supplement ERS's Commodity Costs and Returns
data.
Scope/Coverage
The ARMS survey annually collects field-level information on
chemicals and seeds, equipment, previous crops, highly erodible
land, irrigation, and pest, nutrient, and crop residue management
practices. The Crop Production Practices data can be summarized by
crop, year, ERS Farm Resource Region, irrigation system,
previous crop, highly erodible land, and tillage system.
Crop Production Practices provides customized annual data
summaries for several field crops and production practice topics
for production years beginning in 1996 (years available differ by
commodity, see below).
Field Crops
• Corn (1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2005, 2010)
• Soybeans (1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2002, 2006)
• Oats (2005)
• Spring, durum, and winter wheat (1996, 1997, 1998, 2000, 2004,
2009)
• Cotton (1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2003, 2007)
• Sorghum (2003)
• Barley for malt, barley for feed (2003)
• Peanuts (1999, 2004)
• Rice (2006)
Topics
• Irrigation technology and water use
• Nutrient use and management
• Crop residue management and previous crop
• Pest management
• Pesticide use
• Seed use
• Tillage systems
• Manure management
• Precision technology
• Conservation practices
• Organic production practices
• Crop insurance
Note: Production practices, technologies, and inputs used by
farmers vary widely by commodity and region. Hence, data are not
available to summarize all of the above topics for each commodity
or region in the crop production practices data.
Methodology
The ARMS survey is conducted in three phases over the course of
the survey year, which runs from June through April.
- Phase I, conducted during the summer of the reference
year:
Farmers selected for inclusion in the survey sample are screened
to verify their operating status and to determine whether they are
producing commodities targeted for data collection.
- Phase II, conducted in the fall and winter of the reference
year:
Randomly selected operating farms from Phase I are interviewed to
collect information on their production practices and chemical use.
Phase II mirrors the former Cropping Practices Survey. Phase II
data are collected at the individual field or production unit
level.
- Phase III, conducted in the spring of the year following the
reference year:
A nationally representative sample of farmers is interviewed to
obtain information on their costs and returns during the reference
year. Farmers that reported production practices for specific
commodities in Phase II are also contacted to obtain information on
their costs and returns, including data needed to estimate the
costs of production associated with their production practices.
Phase III data are collected at the whole farm level. Phase III
replaces the former Farm Costs and Returns Survey.
The time-series data presented in Crop Production Practices were
generated from the ARMS Phase II sample data. Sampling weights
provided by USDA's National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS)
were adjusted for each completed, usable sample by its share of the
estimated acres planted with the target crop. A jackknife
re-sampling process was used with 15 additional weights from NASS
for each sample to estimate the Relative Standard Error (RSE) for
each data item.
Phase II data include information on the field itself (such as
the soil management practices, previous crops, highly erodible
designation, and yield), size of the field, and the operator's
tenure, including rental arrangements. Seed type, sowing rate, and
cost are collected, as well as information on the tillage equipment
used on the field. Amounts of fertilizer and methods of application
for the crop are recorded, including information on how the
nutrient management decisions are made. Pesticide-management
variables include the amount and number of applications of each
pesticide ingredient, and the management information used to make
that determination. Additional information includes irrigation
water applications and timing, drying costs and methods, and the
use of crop insurance.

Additional crops, technologies, and practices will be added to
Crop Production Practices as data are collected and processed.