Policy
Related Reports
- Oil Crops Outlook: March 2013
- Outlook for U.S. Agricultural Trade
- Resources, Policies, and Agricultural Productivity in Sub-Saharan Africa
- Oil Crops Outlook: February 2013
- USDA Agricultural Projections to 2022
- Rising Grain Exports by the Former Soviet Union Region
- Rice Outlook: January 2013
- Cotton and Hydropower in Central Asia: How Resource Competition Affects Trade
- Southeast Asia’s Rice Surplus
- Vegetables and Pulses Outlook; December 2012
- Outlook for U.S. Agricultural Trade: November 2012
- Rice Outlook: November 2012
- Economic Policy and Cotton in Uzbekistan
- Livestock, Dairy, and Poultry Outlook: October 2012
- Rice Outlook: October 2012
- Vegetables and Pulses Outlook: September 2012
- Sugar and Sweeteners Outlook: September 2012
- Wheat Outlook: September 2012
- Rice Outlook: September 2012
- Outlook for U.S. Agricultural Trade: August 2012
- Sugar and Sweeteners Outlook: August 2012
- Wheat Outlook: August 2012
- Rice Outlook: August 2012
- Reciprocal Trade Agreements: Impacts on U.S. and Foreign Suppliers in Commodity and Manufactured Food Markets
- China’s Market for Distillers Dried Grains and the Key Influences on Its Longer Run Potential
- Dynamic PEATSim Model Documenting Its Use in Analyzing Global Commodity Markets
- Sugar and Sweeteners Outlook: July 2012
- Rice Outlook: July 2012
- International Food Security Assessment, 2012-22
- Policy, Technology, and Efficiency of Brazilian Agriculture
- Vegetables and Pulses Outlook: June 2012
- Indonesia’s Modern Food Retail Sector: Interaction With Changing Food Consumption and Trade Patterns
- Estimating the Range of Food-Insecure Households in India
- Livestock, Dairy, and Poultry Outlook: May 2012
- Sugar and Sweeteners Outlook: May 2012
- U.S. Net Textile and Apparel Imports Decline in 2011
- USDA Agricultural Projections to 2021
- China’s Volatile Pork Industry
- Livestock, Dairy, and Poultry Outlook: January 2012
- Long-Term Growth Prospects for Wheat Production in Afghanistan
- Research Investments and Market Structure in the Food Processing, Agricultural Input, and Biofuel Industries Worldwide
- Livestock, Dairy, and Poultry Outlook: December 2011
- Livestock, Dairy, and Poultry Outlook: October 2011
- Trade, the Expanding Mexican Beef Industry, and Feedlot and Stocker Cattle Production in Mexico
- Wheat Flour Price Shocks and Household Food Security in Afghanistan
- The Expansion of Modern Grocery Retailing and Trade in Developing Countries
- Brazil’s Ethanol Industry: Looking Forward
- Brazil’s Cotton Industry: Economic Reform and Development
- Reciprocal Trade Agreements: Impacts on Bilateral Trade Expansion and Contraction in the World Agricultural Marketplace
- International Evidence on Food Consumption Patterns: An Update Using 2005 International Comparison Program Data
- Peru: An Emerging Exporter of Fruits and Vegetables
- The U.S. and Mexican Dry Bean Sectors
- Japan’s Beef Market
- Food Security Assessment, 2010-20
- Fruit and Tree Nuts Outlook: April 2010
- Growth and Equity Effects of Agricultural Marketing Efficiency Gains in India
- Feed Outlook: December 2009
- The Economics of Agricultural and Wildlife Smuggling
- U.S. Cotton Prices and the World Cotton Market: Forecasting and Structural Change
- What the 2008/2009 World Economic Crisis Means for Global Agricultural Trade
- Trade and Development When Exports Lack Diversification: A Case Study from Malawi
- Imports From China and Food Safety Issues
- Food Security Assessment, 2008-09
- Russia’s Growing Agricultural Imports: Causes and Outlook
- China's Ongoing Agricultural Modernization: Challenges Remain After 30 Years of Reform
- USDA Agricultural Projections to 2018
- Declining Orange Consumption in Japan: Generational Changes or Something Else?
- Colombia: A New Ethanol Producer on the Rise?
- Food Safety and Imports: An Analysis of FDA Import Refusal Reports
- The EU Sugar Policy Regime and Implications of Reform
- The Environment for Agricultural and Agribusiness Investment in India
- Food Security Assessment, 2007
- Fruit and Tree Nuts Outlook: March 2008
- USDA Agricultural Projections to 2017
- China’s Cotton Supply and Demand: Issues and Impact on the World Market
- How Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (H5N1) Has Affected World Poultry-Meat Trade
- Beef Production, Markets, and Trade in Argentina and Uruguay: An Overview
- Fruit and Tree Nuts Outlook: September 2007
- Global Growth, Macroeconomic Change, and U.S. Agricultural Trade
- China Currency Appreciation Could Boost U.S. Agricultural Exports
- Indian Wheat and Rice Sector Policies and the Implications of Reform
- USDA Agricultural Projections to 2016
- Demand for Food Quantity and Quality in China
- Food Security Assessment 2005, GFA 17
- The Role of Policy and Industry Structure in India's Oilseed Markets
- Trade Liberalization in International Dairy Markets: Estimated Impacts
- China's Rising Fruit and Vegetable Exports Challenge U.S. Industries
- Prospects for India's Emerging Apple Market
- Resolution of the U.S.- Japan Apple Dispute: New Opportunities for Trade
- Growth Prospects for India's Cotton and Textile Industries
- Agricultural Trade Preferences and the Developing Countries
- Food Security Assessment, GFA 16
- New Directions in Global Food Markets
- China's Soybean Imports Expected To Grow Despite Short-Term Disruptions
- Global Trade Patterns in Fruits and Vegetables
- Food Security Assessment, GFA-15
- India's Poultry Sector: Development and Prospects
- International Trade and Food Safety: Economic Theory and Case Studies
- International Evidence on Food Consumption Patterns
- Food Security Assessment GFA14
- Structural Change and Agricultural Protection: Costs of Korean Agricultural Policy, 1975 and 1990
- China's Food and Agriculture: Issues for the 21st Century
- Food Security Assessment GFA13
- Livestock Sectors in the Economies of Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union: Transition from Plan to Market and the Road Ahead
- Agriculture in Brazil and Argentina: Developments and Prospects for Major Field Crops
- Changing Structure of Global Food Consumption and Trade
- Agricultural Policy Reform in the WTO--The Road Ahead
- Issues in Food Security
- Food Security Assessment GFA12
- U.S. Farm Exports to APEC Forum Members Up 23 Percent in FY1995, to Record High
Related Amber Waves Articles
Resource for production
Agricultural research
More information
For decades, Brazil's import-substitution industrialization
(ISI) development approach promoted industrial development at the
expense of agriculture by keeping food prices low. During the 1960s
and 1970s, Brazil used subsidized credit, minimum prices, and
government stock accumulation to compensate agriculture for the
pro-industrial tilt of its economic policies. Simultaneously,
Brazil pursued its long-term national economic development plan to
incorporate intensive agriculture systems in the agricultural
frontier in the country's Center-West region and theCerradosarea,
with concurrent infrastructure investments. Up to the mid-1980s,
these policies were also accompanied by increasing government
investment in agricultural research and a rural extension
program.
With fiscal austerity in the 1990s, Brazil reduced much of the
support provided to agriculture. During this time, there was a
dramatic economic shift towards market-oriented policy reforms,
including trade liberalization, privatization, and opening to
foreign investment. In this new environment, the main factor behind
the growth of agricultural production was the strong systematic
increase in productivity, paired with changes to Brazil's agrarian
structure to include large-scale commercial farms and consolidating
modern production systems to supply both domestic and external
markets. Since 1996, domestic support to Brazilian agricultural
producers has been provided through subsidized credit and price
support programs.
Domestic support to Brazilian agricultural producers
historically has been provided through policies that seek to
address three principal objectives:
- Provide subsidized credit for production and investment, with
funds offered at below-market interest rates.
- Provide income support to commercial agricultural
producers-including individuals, farm cooperatives, and
processors-through various intervention mechanisms in the marketing
of commodities.
- Support rural development through subsidized credit and income
support programs for low-income, small-scale producers and agrarian
reform settlers.
Brazil's agricultural policies are implemented by the Federal
Government with credit disbursed through the National System of
Rural Credit (Sistema Nacional de Crédito Rural, or SNCR)
and administered by the Central Bank in coordination with Banco do
Brasil, Banco de Crédito da Amazônia, Banco do Nordeste do Brasil,
and Banco Nacional de Crédito Cooperativo.
The SNCR credit system provides about one-third of the farm
sector credit needs at subsidized, below-market fixed interest
rates, with the rest coming from private sources. Economic
liberalization has given Brazilian producers access to credit from
traders, processors, and input manufacturers, especially for
modern, export-oriented sectors like soybeans and cotton.
The amount the Brazilian Government has budgeted for agriculture
has tripled since crop year 2002/03 (July to June). The 2011/2012
Agricultural and Livestock Plan allocated US $73.4 billion in
credit for production, marketing, investment, and subsistence
agriculture, nearly a two-fold increase over the 2007/2008 Plan
(see Brazil's
Rural Credit Programs
).
Resources for Production,
Marketing, and Investment
Loans are available to finance commodity production and
marketing (54.2 percent of total financial resources), farms and
processors investment (18.0 percent), agribusinesses (13 percent),
and subsistence farms (14.8 percent). About two-thirds of the
resources for production and marketing loans come from a reserve
that the Government requires banks to set aside for credit lines to
farmers, equaling 28 percent of their deposits, with banks being
compensated through a Government equalization program that provides
some funding to the banks to offset the lower returns they get from
lending to agriculture. The remaining production and marketing
funds come from other government programs.
Production credit loans are used to buy inputs for planting with
a loan period of around 9 months, and are repaid when the
production is sold. Subsidized loans for production (currently at
6.75 percent per year) are available to producers depending on the
commodity. Other government subsidized investment credit programs
charge interest rates of between 6.75 and 9.5 percent per year,
while the new Low Carbon Agriculture Program incorporated in the
2011/2012 Agricultural and Livestock Plan charges a 5.5 percent
interest rate. These subsidized rates compare to recent market
interest rates for farmers in Brazil of between 20 and 25 percent
per year.
Marketing credit programs have been heavily used by Brazilian
agricultural producers when domestic minimum prices announced by
the Government have been significantly below market prices. The
value of a marketing credit loan is based on the quantity of output
owned by the farmer times the minimum pre-established price for the
crop year; the typical loan term is 180 days. The most significant
marketing credit program is the Federal Government Loans
(Empréstimo do Governo Federal, EFG), which in 2010 disbursed over
$5.3 billion for the marketing of most agricultural commodities.
Other marketing credit programs also exist, but are currently small
compared with the EGF. One is the Rural Product Note (Cédula de
Produto Rural, CPR)and the Rural Promissory Note/Rural
Duplicate (Nota Promissória Rural, NPR/Duplicata
Rural, DR).
In Brazil, commodity price support programs are based on a
system of minimum guaranteed prices. The current system of price
support was established in 1996 and revolves around auctions of
premiums between the minimum and market prices. Minimum support
prices for each commodity and the portion of the crop that will be
eligible for the program, are announced in the annual agricultural
economic plan.
The leading income support program is the Equalizing Premium
Paid to Growers(Prêmio Equalizador Pago ao Produtor,
PEPRO). This program, principally used by cotton, corn,
and bean producers, has been operating since 1996 and allows
individual growers or cooperatives to sell the commodities for a
return greater than the market price by receiving an "equalizing
premium" from the Government. In a reverse auction that occurs at
several scheduled points during harvest, farmers willing to accept
the smallest premium win the right to receive payments. A second
income support programs to aide in the marketing of rice, corn and
wheat include the Program for Product Flow (Prêmio para
Escoamento do Produto, PEP). The Risk Premium to Purchase
Ag. Products/Private Selling Option Contracts-PROPprimarily used by
corn and soybean producers was eliminated in 2009.
The Brazilian Government also maintains publicly owned stocks of
agricultural commodities acquired through purchasing programs. The
programs leading to stock acquisition include the Federal
Government Acquisition (Aquisição do Governo Federal,
AGF) and the Selling Option Contract of Agricultural Products
(Contrato Governamental de Opção de Venda). Through the
AGF mechanism (available for cotton, rice, corn, sorghum, wheat,
coffee, and beans), the Government purchases the product at the
minimum guarantee price (higher than the market price); farmers
store the product they intend to sell to the Government in a
warehouse accredited by CONAB. The Selling Option Contract of
Agricultural Products serves as insurance for low market prices.
Individual farmers and/or cooperatives buy or sell option contracts
through public auction, pay a price (called a premium) and have the
right to sell their production at a pre-set value (called an
exercise price), on the date the contract expires. This program has
been primarily used by corn and coffee producers.
Investment credit is provided through a variety of programs
administered by the National Development Bank (BNDES). The largest
is the Programa Modernização da Frota de Máquinas e
Equipamentos Agrícolas (MODERFROTA), for agricultural
machinery. The program is aimed at medium- and large-scale
producers and was an important component of the opening of new
production areas in Brazil in the 1990s and helped mechanized
Brazilian agriculture.
Brazil's government policy to expand social programs and reduce
poverty has increased funding for the National Program for the
Strengthening of Family Agriculture (PRONAF). Funds under these
programs have increased to $9.1 billion in 2011/2012 from $6.2
billion in 2007-2008. These programs provide subsidized interest
rates of between 0.5 to 4.5 percent to low income producers. PRONAF
is expected to benefit nearly 2 million low-income agricultural
producers, deriving at least 70 percent of their income from
agriculture.
Brazil's government policy to expand social programs and reduce
poverty has increased funding for the National Program for the
Strengthening of Family Agriculture (PRONAF). Funds under these
programs have increased to $9.6 billion in 2011/2012 from $6.2
billion in 2007-2008. These programs provide subsidized interest
rates of between 0.5 to 4.5 percent to low income producers. PRONAF
is expected to benefit nearly 2 million low-income agricultural
producers, deriving at least 70 percent of their income from
agriculture.
Brazilian agricultural policy instruments and the corresponding
annual credit allocations are routinely consolidated in the annual
Agricultural and Livestock Plan (Plano Agrícola y Pecuário, PAP)
executed by the Ministry of Agriculture (Ministério da Agricultura;
Pecuária e Abastecimento, MAPA) and the Harvest Plan for Family
Agriculture executed by the Ministry of Agrarian Development (Plano
Safra da Agricultura Familiar, Ministério do Desenvolvimento
Agrário, MDA).
In addition to Federal Government support, State Governments
have at times implemented support programs for development of crop
production and agro-processing industries. Programs for farm debt
forgiveness and rescheduling with longer repayment terms and with
lower interests rates have been regularly made available to
Brazilian producers by legislators in the Brazilian Congress.
Agricultural Research
The increasing investment in research has been singled out by
MAPA researchers of Brazilian agriculture as an important factor
and credited with the rapid technological development of the
sector. Agricultural research was carried out through several
public and private Brazilian research institutions and
universities. But it was EMBRAPA, the Brazilian Agricultural
Research Enterprise, a public corporation linked to the Ministry of
Agriculture and Food Supply, which played the key role in
developing and diffusing new agricultural technologies.
Created in 1973, EMBRAPA's primary task was applied research on
cereals, animal production, fruits and vegetables to generate and
transfer new technologies, genetic materials, and production
practices that would lead to productivity increases. Since its
creation and throughout the 1980s, the main focus was regional
adaptive research-the adaptation of agricultural systems to the new
ecosystems in the new production frontiers, particularly in the
semi-arid lands of the Cerrados.
EMBRAPA was also tasked with providing extension services for
the distribution of these new technological packages, which
included new and improved seeds, the provision of soil correction
techniques and implementation of agricultural practices, including
the use of new machinery and equipment in traditional and newly
developed regions of the Cerrados.
EMBRAPA's research system was centrally coordinated but carried
out through 16 commodity research centers, 10 agro-system research
centers, 14 regional research centers, and several service and
technology transfer research centers located through the country.
EMBRAPA receives funding from the Brazilian government and
international institutions. The amount of resources allocated to
EMBRAPA increased from an average of US $246 million per year (in
constant 1993 US$), during the 1976-80 period to over US $450
million per year during the 1990's (also in 1993 US$). EMBRAPA is
credited with recommending more than nine thousand technologies for
Brazilian agriculture, which significantly reduced production costs
and helped Brazil to expand its productive capacity (MAPA,
2010).
One of the most significant contributions of EMBRAPA to the
growth of Brazilian agriculture is EMBRAPA's crop varieties role on
the Brazilian seed market, in particular for rice, beans, corn,
wheat, soybeans, potatoes and cotton. Another instance of EMBRAPA's
involvement has been on developing improved grass varieties, and
new breeds for cross-breeding cattle with domestic breeds. Funds
were also applied to extension services and new farming techniques
such as no-till production, crop rotation systems, market
information systems, and adaptation of farm equipment to local
conditions.
The results of the investments in agricultural research resulted
in high productivity advances for crops and animal products.
Production of major crops (soybeans, corn, rice, edible beans, and
wheat) rose to 54 million tons in 1990, double the level of 1970.
During the 1990s, total oilseed area increased 1 percent per year,
compared with a decrease of 1.9 percent per year for total grain
area, while yield increased 5.2 percent per year, compared with 4.3
percent per year for grains.
More Information
Additional information on Brazil's economy and credit sector is
available from a number of sources: