Stay Connected

Follow ERS on Twitter
Subscribe to RSS feeds
Subscribe to ERS e-Newsletters.aspx
Listen to ERS podcasts
Read ERS blogs at USDA

Integrating Commodity and Conservation Programs: Design Options and Outcomes

by Roger Claassen, Marcel Aillery, and Cynthia Nickerson

Economic Research Report No. (ERR-44) 61 pp, October 2007

cover image for err44 Can a single program support farm income and encourage producers to adopt environmentally sound farming practices? While simple in concept, attempting to roll the farm income support features of existing commodity programs and conservation payments into a single program raises questions. Exactly how would farm commodity and conservation payments be combined? What difference would it make for environmental gain and farm income support? This report approaches the questions in two ways. First, spending patterns in existing commodity and conservation programs are analyzed to determine the extent to which producers who are currently receiving commodity payments also receive conservation payments. Then, a number of hypothetical program scenarios are devised and analyzed to estimate how emphasis on current income support recipients would differ from a combined program that focuses on achieving cost-effective environmental gain. The results show that policymakers face significant tradeoffs between environmental (conservation) objectives and farm income support objectives in designing a program that provides both income support and environmental gain.

Keywords: commodity programs, payments, producers, conservation, environmental performance, environmental gain, income support, green payments, cost, farm, compliance, practices, eligibility, distribution

In this publication...

Need help with PDFs?

Last updated: Sunday, May 27, 2012

For more information contact: Roger Claassen, Marcel Aillery, and Cynthia Nickerson