School Foodservice Costs: Location Matters
by
Michael Ollinger,
Katherine Ralston, and
Joanne GuthrieEconomic Research Report No. (ERR-117) 52 pp, May 2011
The National School Lunch Program and School Breakfast Program
reimburse school food authorities (SFAs) for providing school meals
that meet USDA nutritional standards. Reimbursement rates depend on
whether the meal is lunch or breakfast and whether the student is
certified to receive the meal for free or at reduced or full price.
Reimbursement rates are the same for all SFAs, except those in
Alaska or Hawaii and for schools in which a certain percentage of
children receive free or reduced-price lunches even though
cost-of-living indexes for all 50 States show considerable
variation in food and labor costs. No previous research has
rigorously examined whether school foodservice costs vary
geographically, or identified the factors that help explain those
differences.
What Are the Major Findings?
In this study, we measured geographic variation in school
foodservice costs, after accounting for nongeographic factors, to
better clarify economic and operational factors that help explain
why per meal costs vary by school location. We examined the impact
of (1) location; (2) total USDA reimbursable breakfasts and lunches
served; (3) measures of input prices for labor, food, and supplies;
and (4) several SFA characteristics affecting total school
foodservice cost: the mix of breakfasts and lunches served, a
measure of meal value that was based on prices charged to students
paying the full price for lunch, a la carte revenue per meal, and
other aspects of foodservice operation.
• After accounting for nongeographic characteristics of SFAs, we
found that average foodservice costs per reimbursable meal
(including all breakfasts and lunches) in 21 locations (rural,
urban, and suburban areas across 7 U.S. regions) range from 21
percent below the national average for the rural Southwest to 19
percent above in the suburban Midwest. The Southwest and Southeast
regions had average costs per meal below the national average, and
urban locations had lower average costs per meal than their rural
and suburban counterparts.
• The main drivers of differences in foodservice cost varied by
location. Wage and benefit rates were the largest contributors in
five locations. SFA characteristics-particularly the total number
of reimbursable meals served, this study's measure of meal value,
and the presence of a la carte foods-were the most important
factors behind cost differences in five locations. In the remaining
11 locations, per meal cost variation was largely due to
differences in total food expenditure per meal, which include
differences in food item prices and food items served.
• Per meal costs dropped when the number of meals served rose and
when the SFA served more lower-value meals. Per meal costs rose
when the SFA served more higher-value meals and had more than 10
cents per meal in a la carte food sales.
This study examines the extent to which location influences
school foodservice costs per meal. It does not examine the effects
of cost variation on financial solvency of an SFA or the adequacy
of USDA meal reimbursements. Higher per meal costs do not
necessarily indicate that an SFA is operating at a loss because
higher cost SFAs may also have higher revenues. Due to data
limitations, we can determine neither the extent to which higher
per meal costs are associated with higher revenues per meal nor
whether higher cost SFAs are more likely to serve meals that meet
USDA nutrition standards.
How Was the Study Conducted?
Previous cost estimates for school meals used accounting methods
to estimate the cost per meal to SFAs of providing
USDA-reimbursable lunches and breakfasts, but lacked the necessary
sample size to obtain regional averages. We, however, used data
from 1,432 SFAs participating in the 2004 School Food Authority
Characteristics survey, a nationally representative survey that was
stratified to allow estimates by region and urbanicity. The survey
was administered by USDA's Food and Nutrition Service and collected
data for the 2002-03 school year. To measure the effects of
location on total school foodservice costs, we employed a flexible
econometric approach and controlled for total reimbursable meals
served (including breakfasts and lunches), measures for input
prices, and SFA characteristics.
Due to limitations of our data set, our measure of the input
price for food was constructed as total food expenditure per
reimbursable meal. This measure reflects both differences in prices
paid by SFAs for individual food items and in food items served,
making the separation of these two influences on per meal costs
difficult. We developed a measure of meal "value" to adjust for
differences in food items served; this measure may also reflect
differences in food item prices to some extent. For the labor cost
measure, we used local salaries and wages reported in the survey to
estimate the cost to each SFA of a standardized set of foodservice
personnel.