Rural Broadband At A Glance, 2009 Edition
by
Peter Stenberg and
Sarah A. LowEconomic Information Bulletin No. (EIB-47) 2 pp, February 2009
The size and growth of U.S. Internet use is impressive as it
becomes more embedded in national and rural economies.
Three-quarters of U.S. residents used the Internet to access
information, education, and services in 2007. Widespread Internet
adoption suggests it has great value to individuals, businesses,
and communities. Broadband Internet access is becoming essential
for both businesses and households; many compare its evolution to
other technologies now considered common necessities-such as cars,
electricity, televisions, microwave ovens, and cell phones.
Although rural residents enjoy widespread access to the
Internet, they are less likely to have high-speed, or broadband,
Internet access than their urban counterparts. Nonetheless,
broadband access for both rural and urban populations increased
rapidly between 2000 and 2006. The main limitation of slower,
dial-up Internet access is that many content-dense applications and
documents, and such critical services as anti-virus protections,
are not readily usable via dial-up due to low transmission
capability and speed. Broadband Internet access in rural areas is
less prevalent than in more densely populated areas of the country.
Circumstantial evidence suggests that the difference in access may
lie in the higher cost and limited availability of broadband
Internet in rural areas. As a result, rural residents depend more
on Internet use outside of the home, relying on places like the
library, school, and work, where broadband Internet access is
available.

Internet Use: Broadband and Dial-Up
Access
Broadband Availability
Broadband's Relationship to Rural
Business
Broadband's Relationship With Rural People and
Households
The Value of Broadband: Telemedicine
Internet Use: Broadband and
Dial-Up Access
Internet use is lower for individuals in rural areas (71
percent) than in urban areas (77 percent). Overall, household
Internet activity is lower than individual activity. If one person
in a household uses the Internet, however, other members are also
likely to use it. In 2007, 63 percent of all rural households had
at least one member access the Internet, at home or elsewhere,
compared with 73 percent of urban households. Fifty-two percent of
all rural households had in-home Internet access compared with 64
percent of urban households.
High-income households may have already reached a saturation
point. High-income households that do not already have Internet
access have indicated that they do not want it. Low-income
households access the Internet less at home than high-income
households do. If Internet use is related to household income, then
broadband Internet adoption may also be related to household
income. The underlying causes behind this relationship, however,
cannot be explored further without better data on household
Internet use, education, age, and the pricing/cost of
broadband
Internet access.


| Measuring Broadband Availability... |
|
Measuring broadband availability is problematic, and no consumer
price data are available nationwide. Geographically detailed
broadband data with national coverage are available for U.S. ZIP
Code areas from the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). FCC
data report the number of companies providing broadband service in
a ZIP Code area. These data overestimate broadband availability,
however, because broadband "availability" requires that only one
customer be located in that ZIP Code area. Results reported here
should be interpreted with these limitations in mind.
|

Broadband Availability
The growth in broadband availability since 2000 has been rapid.
In 2000, land-based broadband service provision was clustered in
highly urbanized areas with service available only in a limited
number of rural areas. By 2006, broadband availability was far more
common in rural areas. Throughout this decade, broadband access has
increased, but is less likely to be found in rural areas. Today,
clusters of lower service exist in sparsely populated areas, such
as the Dakotas, eastern Montana, northern Minnesota, and eastern
Oregon. Other low-service areas have an aging population and are
experiencing persistent population loss (e.g., the Missouri-Iowa
border
and Appalachia).
Government policies that encourage deployment of broadband
services increased availability and, in some cases, encouraged more
competitive pricing. The Universal Service Program established by
the 1996 Telecommunications Act funded broadband Internet access
for medical facilities and elementary and secondary schools. The
2008 Farm Bill (Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008)
reauthorized USDA's telemedicine and distance learning and rural
broadband access grant and loan programs. The Distance Learning,
Telemedicine, and Broadband provision of the American Recovery and
Reinvestment Act of 2009 provided $2.5 billion to USDA for loans
and grants to increase broadband provision in primarily rural
areas.
Depending on the ultimate goal of universal Internet access, the
distinction between individual access and household access can be
important. The gap in Internet use between rural and urban
households (9.3 percentage points) is wider than the gap between
all rural and urban individuals (6.5 percentage points-underlying
data available from authors). Policies encouraging broadband access
generally adopt either an implicit individual or household
approach, where the policy addresses one population directly with
only secondary efforts directed at the other. If, for example, the
policy goal is to improve educational opportunities for school-age
children, a program that improves in-school broadband access may be
more cost effective than one designed to improve broadband access
to households, although such a program may also spur household
adoption.
Broadband's Relationship to
Rural Business
Broadband Internet enables businesses to increase efficiencies
in existing commercial relationships, increase market presence by
reducing the cost of reaching larger markets, and introduce new
services. Broadband Internet, however, can also increase
competition between businesses (e.g., local banks must compete with
Internet-only banks). Business adoption of the Internet has been
rapid. In 1997, 13 percent of farmers were using the Internet for
farm business; 10 years later, use had increased to 55 percent. As
Internet adoption increases, the need for high-speed Internet also
rises as online purchasing and marketing become the norm. Rural
businesses, however, use broadband less than urban businesses,
perhaps due to higher prices for rural broadband service. Online
business activity provides rural businesses with potential benefits
due to the efficiencies found in high-speed Internet access:
- Direct sales from manufacturer to consumer are available on a
broader scale. Value-added and niche agricultural products,
horticulture, and other specialty products, for example, are often
sold directly to consumers.
- Business-to-business transactions over the Internet have
increased substantially. By 2003, online wholesale trade of farm
products had already reached $3.7 billion or approximately 3
percent of all wholesale farm product sales, while all online
wholesale trade had reached $386 billion or 13 percent of all
wholesale trade.
- Online retail sales have increased substantially. Rural retail
business Internet users found that broadband access allowed them to
increase operational effectiveness and exploit market niches.
Broadband's Relationship With
Rural People and Households
Broadband Internet gives rural residents access to goods and
services that may not otherwise be available locally or via dial-up
Internet. Online purchases now replace the once common Sears and
Roebuck catalog. Broadband Internet access can also affect purchase
decisions, however, facilitating price discovery and consumer
information gathering. Real estate and automobile purchases are
examples of markets that have been significantly impacted by
Internet-based consumer price discovery activities. Broadband
Internet also facilitates services, such as online banking,
teleworking, and distance education, which would not be possible
with dial-up Internet. Examples of how broadband Internet affects
rural residents include the following:
- Teleworking and increased marketing opportunities generate jobs
and economic development.
- Government services can be more accessible and convenient.
- Telemedicine reduces patients' time off work and out-of-pocket
expenses.
Internet access is recognized as an important tool for many
different aspects of social life. Experts fear that areas without
broadband Internet access are being systematically segregated from
activities in their region. Research shows that broadband Internet
facilitates greater contributions to community vitality through
civic engagement and community participation.
The gap between rural and urban household broadband use suggests
broadband availability and cost presents more of a challenge for
rural households. As such, the percentage of households with
broadband increases as household income rises. Broadband providers
now offer tiers of service speeds so that users can match their
needs and affordability, but these options may not be available in
rural areas. Unfortunately, broadband price data are not available
nationally; such data would help researchers and policymakers
better understand and address the gap in rural and urban broadband
use. For example, pricing data are needed to assess the extent to
which
broadband access cost limits use in areas where it is physically
available and to better understand the impact of public policy on
broadband use.
The Value of Broadband:
Telemedicine
Rural residents often face challenges accessing a full range of
health care services. Today, due to the availability of broadband
Internet, rural health care providers can more easily link with
urban providers through the use of health information technology.
There is a national push to create electronic health records for
all Americans so that patient information can follow individuals
from one health care provider to the next. The ability to meet that
goal is dependent on all health care providers' having the kind of
rich connectivity available only through broadband Internet
services. Rural health care providers and their patients also
benefit from the use of telemedicine
technology, where specialty services can be offered real-time to
clinics and hospitals that may not have full-time specialists.
Patients no longer have to travel long distances or wait to consult
with specialists, and emergency cases may not always have to be
evacuated to a larger hospital. Telemedicine is helping address an
acute problem in the United States, where vast distances and low
population densities have led to doctor shortages for many rural
communities. Other benefits from telemedicine include the
following:
Medical benefits
- Improving the perception of locally provided health care
quality.
- Offering a larger menu of locally provided medical
services.
- Treating emergencies more efficiently.
- Telehome monitoring can help providers better manage elderly
rural residents with chronic conditions, thereby reducing
hospitalizations and avoiding early placement in nursing homes or
assisted-living care facilities.
Economic benefits
- Reducing time off work due to decreased travel time to access
specialist care.
- Lowering the cost of travel to receive care.
- Increasing revenue from pharmacy and lab work that can be
conducted locally.
- Reducing costs to health facilities by outsourcing specialized
medical procedures.
In summary, rural communities have not been left out of the
ever-changing information economy, although issues of equal access
exist. Evidence suggests that the difference in access may lie in
the higher cost or limited availability of broadband Internet in
rural areas. Data on broadband use in households and businesses and
its cost are needed to better address this issue.
| What is Broadband? |
| The Federal Communications Commission has historically defined
broadband Internet service as providing a minimum of 200 kilobits
per second (kbs). This speed is much faster than dial-up, which has
a maximum speed of 56 kbs and can be as slow as 14 kbs in rural
areas. Unfortunately, the definition, although recently updated to
a tiered definition, includes a wide array of technologies with
varying reliability and quality, making economic impact analysis
and discussion of broadband Internet service challenging. |
| Data Resources |
This report draws on the research of ERS's Resource and Rural
Economics Division. Data in this analysis are drawn from the
Federal Communication Commission's (FCC) Form 477 survey and the
U.S. Census Bureau's Current Population Survey (CPS).
FCC Form 477 survey data provide a biannual account of broadband
Internet service providers in each ZIP Code area. The number of
providers in areas with one, two, or three providers, however, is
not disclosed to protect firm confidentiality. Form 477 represents
the only nationwide data on the number of broadband providers
serving rural communities. The CPS surveys a nationally
representative sample of households in both rural and urban areas
and
included a supplement on "Internet and Computer Use" in its August
2000, September 2001, October 2003, and October 2007 surveys.
Additional data resources include surveys and the Local Exchange
Routing Guide data on the number of local exchange carriers and
switches. USDA's June Agricultural Survey (since 1997),
Agricultural Resource Management Survey (since 2005), and Census of
Agriculture (2007) provided information on Internet and broadband
adoption by farm households. The Pew Internet & American Life
Project has also conducted multiple, publicly available, nationwide
surveys of household use of the Internet. In addition, some States
(e.g., North Carolina and Kentucky) collect data on broadband
availability within their borders, affording more geographic detail
than that provided in the FCC data. |
| Background and Contacts... |
Findings in Rural Broadband at a Glance are drawn from a larger
body of research currently underway. ERS is conducting a
multi-disciplinary nationwide study of the economic issues
surrounding broadband access and use in rural America. Ongoing
research focuses on broadband use, broadband availability, and the
effects of broadband Internet service on rural growth and
prosperity, the provision of community public services, access to
healthcare, and
rural well-being.
For additional information on this topic, please contact Peter
Stenberg at stenberg@ers.usda.gov or Sarah Low at
slow@ers.usda.gov. |