Rural America At A Glance, 2007 Edition
by
Lorin KusminEconomic Information Bulletin No. (EIB-31) 6 pp, October 2007
Between July 2005 and July 2006, the population of nonmetro
America grew 0.6 percent. Net domestic migration from metro areas
accounted for nearly half of this growth. Gains from domestic
migration were highest in areas that offered natural amenities,
proximity to metro jobs, or both. Counties with diverse
service-based economies-primarily those that rely on recreation and
tourism-also experienced higher than average growth from net
domestic migration in 2005-06. (Data on metro and nonmetro areas in
this report are based on 2003 metro area designations except where
indicated.)
Nonmetro employment increased by 1.4 percent from 2005 to 2006,
a rate similar to that of the previous year. After a steep decline
between 2000 and 2003, employment in the manufacturing sector has
been stable since 2004. The nonmetro unemployment rate fell to 4.9
percent in 2006.
Nonmetro areas continue to lag behind metro areas on indicators
of income and experience higher rates of poverty. The nonmetro
poverty rate, however, declined from 15.1 percent in 2004 to 14.5
percent in 2005.
Nonmetro adult educational attainment continued to rise between
2000 and 2005. About 17 percent of the nonmetro population age 25
and older held at least a 4-year college degree in 2005, a 1.5
percentage-point gain from 2000. Nonmetro rates of high school
noncompletion fell sharply during the same period, from 23 to 19
percent.
The socioeconomic vitality of rural America is linked to a
number of key elements, including a core set of demographic,
educational, and economic forces. Following are the most current
indicators of social and economic conditions in rural areas, for
use in developing policies and programs to assist rural people and
their communities. In addition, two sectors that are emerging as
important factors shaping the economic complexion of rural America
are given special attention in this year's report: creative
occupations and ethanol-based industries.

Rural Population Growth on an
Upswing Due to Net Domestic Migration
Between July 2005 and July 2006, the population of nonmetro
America grew by 318,000 people. This 0.6-percent increase is below
the metro growth rate for the same period (1 percent) but is well
above the nonmetro annual growth rate of 0.2 percent at the
beginning of the decade. The upturn is due entirely to an increase
in net domestic migration-the number of people moving from metro
counties to nonmetro destinations minus those moving in the
opposite direction.

- In 2001-02, 40,000 more people moved into nonmetro counties
from metro locations than moved out. In that year, the gain from
domestic migration was less than that from either international
immigration or natural population increase (births - deaths).
However, the annual net flow from metro areas grew to nearly
150,000 by 2005-06, thus contributing more to overall nonmetro
population growth than immigration (62,000) or natural increase
(107,000).
- Nonmetro population gains from net domestic migration were
highest in western locations that combine scenic attributes with
tourism, recreation, second-home development, and retirement
migration. Amenities combined with proximity to metro jobs fueled
rapid growth in many parts of the nonmetro South, including the
Texas Hill Country, southern Appalachia, the Florida coast, and
northern Virginia.
- The massive departure of residents from flood-ravaged New
Orleans after September 2005 was followed by sharp rises in the
population of several nonmetro counties in southern Louisiana and
Mississippi, along with nearby metro areas, such as Baton
Rouge.
- Of the 2,070 U.S. nonmetro counties, the number losing
population from net domestic migration declined from 1,157 in
2000-01 to 885 in 2005-06. Net migration loss continued in counties
with very high poverty, such as in the Mississippi Delta and Rio
Grande Valley, and in sparsely settled agricultural counties in the
Nation's heartland. In addition to experiencing high outmigration
among young adults, an increasing number of Great Plains and Corn
Belt counties are losing population through natural decrease-more
deaths than births-which reflects an aging population.
- Counties dependent on mining or manufacturing switched from net
migration losses to net migration gains during the past 5 years.
Farming-dependent counties continued to show an overall net
migration loss in 2005-06, although not as severe as in 2001-02.
Nonmetro counties with more diverse, service-based economies are
better able to retain current residents and attract newcomers.
These counties-which predominantly rely on recreation and
tourism-experienced four times the rate of net domestic migration
in 2005-06 as did nonmetro counties as a whole.
|
Nonmetro population change from net domestic
migration
|
| |
2001-02
|
2005-06
|
| |
|
|
County
|
Number
|
Percent
|
Number
|
Percent
|
|
|
All nonmetro counties
|
39,378
|
0.1
|
145,626
|
0.3
|
|
|
Counties dependent on:
Farming
Mining
Manufacturing
Services
|
-22,581
-374
-11,917
53,389
|
-0.8
0
-0.1
1.2
|
-12,150
8,039
29,571
59,269
|
-0.4
0.4
0.2
1.3
|
|
Source: Calculated by ERS using Census Bureau county
population estimates. |
Employment Rises and
Unemployment Falls From 2005 to 2006

Nonmetro employment increased by 316,000, or 1.4 percent, from
2005 to 2006, while metro employment increased by 2.28 million, or
1.9 percent. Growth rates in both areas were very close to those of
the previous year. Nonmetro employment growth did slow markedly in
the Northeast, from 1.4 percent in 2004-05 to 0.3 percent in
2005-06; however, the heavily metropolitan Northeast accounts for
less than 10 percent of all U.S. nonmetro employment. After a steep
decline between 2000 and 2003, employment in the manufacturing
sector has been stable since 2004.
Both nonmetro and metro unemployment rates have fallen steadily
since they peaked in 2003. The nonmetro unemployment rate fell to
4.9 percent in 2006, down from 5.4 percent in the previous year.
The metro unemployment rate averaged 4.6 percent in 2006, down from
5.0 percent in 2005. Both rates were at their lowest level since
the 2001 recession.
Unemployment rates remained high among minorities and youth, and
lack of employment affected many people other than those formally
defined as unemployed.

- For Blacks and Hispanics, the 2006 unemployment rate stood at
9.5 percent and 4.9 percent, respectively. These rates were both
lower than the previous year's rates. The unemployment rate for
nonmetro teens between ages 16 and 19 was 14.5 percent.
- The nonmetro adjusted unemployment rate, which includes
marginally attached workers (discouraged workers who have searched
for work and are available) and one-half of those who work
part-time but would like to work full-time, was 8.8 percent in
2006, compared with 8.1 percent in metro areas.
Poverty Declines, But Remains
High in the South
The nonmetro poverty rate declined steadily during the latter
part of the 1990s, dropping from 16 percent in 1994 to 13.4 percent
in 2000, the lowest on record. A period of stabilization followed,
with the rate remaining at or below 14.2 percent.
In 2004, the poverty rate in nonmetro areas rose substantially,
reaching 15.1 percent. Most if not all of this increase stemmed
from changes in metropolitan area designations in 2003. Many
rapidly growing, relatively wealthy counties with emerging suburban
or exurban populations switched from a nonmetro to a metro
designation, based on 2000 Census counts and definitional changes.
This reclassification significantly altered the geography and
socioeconomic profile of "nonmetro" America because the populations
that remained nonmetro were, on average, more disadvantaged than
those that became metro. At present, 2,052 counties, or about 78
percent of all counties, are classified as nonmetro-298 fewer than
before reclassification.
The latest poverty data available from the Current Population
Survey (2004 and 2005), which uses the 2003 geographic
designations, suggest that nonmetro poverty is once again on the
decline. Yet, nonmetro poverty has historically been and remains
higher than metro poverty, which was 12.2 percent in 2005, compared
to 14.5 percent for nonmetro counties. In fact, nonmetro counties
continue to lag behind their metro counterparts on numerous
indicators of economic well-being:
- Nonmetro median household income ($37,564) continues to be well
below the metro median ($48,474) in 2005. That disparity is also
seen in nonmetro/metro differences in family income by income
range, which are greatest at the high end, from $100,000 and up,
and least in the $40,000-$59,999 range.

- Poverty rates for nonmetro families with related children are
higher than for metro families of the same type and considerably
more so for those families with a female head of household; in
2005, 17.4 percent of nonmetro families with related children were
poor compared with 14 percent of metro families with related
children, and 43.1 percent of nonmetro families with related
children with a female householder were poor compared with 35
percent of metro families of the same type.
- The South continues to have the highest poverty rate for both
nonmetro counties (17.7 percent) and metro counties (13.1 percent)
among all regions. The difference between metro and nonmetro
counties increases when the near poor are also considered: in 2005,
24.3 percent were at or below 125 percent of the poverty income
threshold in the nonmetro South, compared with 17.3 percent in the
metro South.
|
Regional differences in poverty rates for poor and
near-poor, 2005
|
|
| |
At or below income
poverty threshold
|
At or below 125 percent
of income poverty threshold
|
| |
|
|
Region
|
Nonmetro
|
Metro
|
Nonmetro
|
Metro
|
|
|
|
Northeast
Midwest
South
West
Nation
|
11.5
11.5
17.7
14.2
14.5
|
11.3
11.4
13.1
12.4
12.2
|
15.5
15.5
24.3
19.1
19.7
|
14.9
15.1
17.3
16.9
16.3
|
|
Source: U.S. Census Bureau and Bureau of Labor Statistics
Current Population Survey, Annual Social and Economic
Supplement. |
Rural Adults Continue to Lag in
College Completion
Nonmetro adult educational attainment continued its long-term
rise in 2000-05, improving across all major racial and ethnic
groups. But nonmetro adults overall failed to make significant
gains against metro adults, especially in terms of college
completion. Because attainment is measured for all adults age 25
and older, rising education levels largely reflect the declining
statistical influence of those born before the baby boom, who have
much lower average attainment than do younger cohorts.
- About 17 percent of the nonmetro population age 25 and older
held at least a 4-year college degree in 2005. This was a gain of
1.8 percentage points from 2000. The metro college completion rate
exceeded 29 percent in 2005, up 2.9 percentage points from 2000.
The large and persistent nonmetro-metro gap in college completion
reflects a similar-and growing-gap in the returns to a 4-year
college education. Median weekly earnings for college graduates in
2006 were 24 percent higher in metro areas than in nonmetro
areas.
- Nonmetro rates of high school noncompletion fell sharply
between 2000 and 2005, from 24 to 19 percent. The absolute decline
was slightly larger than in metro areas (from 19 to 15
percent).
- Nonmetro Blacks, Hispanics, Native Americans, and Whites all
saw gains in college completion and declines in high school
noncompletion between 2000 and 2005. The largest absolute increases
in college completion rates occurred among nonmetro non-Hispanic
Whites, to 18 percent in 2005.
- Hispanics have the lowest educational attainment levels of any
major nonmetro ethnic group. About half lacked a high school
diploma, and only 7 percent had completed college by 2005.
- Educational attainment levels are lower in the nonmetro South
than in other regions. About 24 percent of nonmetro southern adults
lacked a high school diploma in 2005, and only 15 percent had
completed 4 years of college.

Creative Occupations Fuel Local
Job Growth
One job function that is increasingly important in the knowledge
economy is creative thinking-combining knowledge and ideas in novel
ways to solve problems or create new opportunities. Occupations
that typically require high levels of creativity include engineers,
scientists, designers, artists, and business managers. Highly
creative occupations are found predominantly in metropolitan areas,
but some nonmetro counties also contain a relatively high
proportion of these occupations. These nonmetro counties are
concentrated in New England and mountain areas of the West, but
they are found in every State. Counties with a high share of their
workforce in creative occupations tend to have valued natural
amenities such as mountains or lakes, or large colleges or
universities. Surprisingly, adjacency to a metropolitan area does
not increase the prevalence of highly creative occupations.
The top quarter of all counties, ranked by the percent of
workers in creative occupations as of 1990, experienced faster
employment growth in 1990-2004 than counties in the bottom
three-quarters of this scale. While this holds true for both metro
and nonmetro counties, the difference in growth rates is
considerably larger in nonmetro areas. These large differences may
be attributed to workers in creative occupations being attracted to
the same natural amenities associated with growth in nonmetro
counties. However, even among counties ranking high in natural
amenities, employment growth was twice as fast in counties ranking
high in creative occupations. Alternatively, since workers in
highly creative occupations also tend to be more educated, the
skill level of the workforce may account for differences in growth
rates. Again, looking only at nonmetro counties with a relatively
large college-educated population, employment growth in those
counties with a high percentage of creative occupations was three
times as fast as in those with fewer creative occupations.
Over Half of All Ethanol Plants
Are Located in Declining Nonmetro Counties
Growth of the ethanol
industry has been a notable development in rural America since
2000, especially in the Midwest. Ethanol production tripled from
2000 to 2006, as numerous plants were built and existing plants
expanded capacity. Given the preference to locate plants where
corn-the principal feedstock-is grown, three-fourths of the plants
are in nonmetro counties. Direct employment in the plants is not
large, typically averaging about 35 jobs per plant. The 88 nonmetro
plants employ about 3,100 workers. Systematic wage data for the
plants are not available, but, where known, data consistently
indicate wages higher than the local averages. In addition to jobs
generated by the plants, other expected economic benefits might
include increased market for local corn, higher farmland values,
and investment income from local ownership of some of the
plants.
Seventy percent of the nonmetro ethanol plants in operation are
located in counties that declined in population from 2000 to 2006,
whereas just half of all nonmetro counties lost population. Thus,
most plants are beneficially placed insofar as creating jobs and
income in areas that have been unable to retain their population.
All but three of the plants are in counties that rank below average
on a scale of the presence of natural amenities (relating to
terrain, water bodies, and climate) that are widely associated with
nonmetro growth.
Of new ethanol plants under construction, nearly four-fifths
(67) are in nonmetro counties and 75 percent of these are in
counties with declining population. So the trend of
disproportionate location in declining nonmetro counties is being
somewhat augmented as the industry enlarges. On average, the
oncoming plants are much larger than existing plants, having more
workers per plant but needing fewer workers per unit of output.
|
More Research
on Rural America at ERS...
|
|
USDA's Economic Research Service (ERS) analyzes ongoing changes
in rural areas and assesses Federal, State, and local strategies to
enhance economic opportunity and quality of life for rural
Americans. Included in this report are current indicators of social
and economic conditions in rural areas. The following recent
publications feature research on rural America:
Rural Hispanics at a Glance, by
William Kandel, EIB-8, USDA, Economic Research Service, December
2005.
Low-Skill Employment and the Changing Economy
of Rural America, by Robert Gibbs, Lorin Kusmin, and John
Cromartie, ERR-10, USDA, Economic Research Service, October
2005.
Rural Employment at a Glance, by
Lorin Kusmin and Timothy Parker, EIB-21, USDA, Economic Research
Service, December 2006.
"The Creative Class: A Key to Rural Growth,"
by David McGranahan and Timothy Wojan, Amber Waves, April
2007, pp. 16-21.
Data Resources
This report draws upon the work of researchers at ERS. Data used
in this analysis come from a variety of Federal sources, including
the Bureau of Economic Analysis, the Bureau of Labor Statistics,
the Census Bureau, and USDA. The most recent data are provided,
ranging from 2004 to 2007.
For more on the 2003 definitions of metro and nonmetro areas,
and how they compare with the 1993 definitions, see
Measuring Rurality: New Definitions in 2003.
For more on ERS county types, such as mining-dependent,
manufacturing-dependent, service-dependent, and persistent poverty,
see Measuring Rurality: 2004 County Typology
Codes.
For more on ERS measurement of natural amenities, see Natural Amenities Drive Rural Population
Change.
|