Figure 5.3.1--Farm program payments subject to compliance

$ billion

Stacked Bar chart with 8 groups and 3 items per group.

Group 1, 1997, Total value of 8.67.
Item 1, Conservation value of 2.21 which is 25.5% of 1997.
Item 2, Disaster value of 0.11 which is 1.3% of 1997.
Item 3, Commodity value of 6.35 which is 73.2% of 1997.
Group 2, 1998, Total value of 8.15.
Item 1, Conservation value of 2.35 which is 28.8% of 1998.
Item 2, Disaster value of 0.08 which is 1.0% of 1998.
Item 3, Commodity value of 5.72 which is 70.2% of 1998.
Group 3, 1999, Total value of 16.42.
Item 1, Conservation value of 1.98 which is 12.1% of 1999.
Item 2, Disaster value of 5.33 which is 32.5% of 1999.
Item 3, Commodity value of 9.11 which is 55.5% of 1999.
Group 4, 2000, Total value of 27.48.
Item 1, Conservation value of 2.07 which is 7.5% of 2000.
Item 2, Disaster value of 13.93 which is 50.7% of 2000.
Item 3, Commodity value of 11.48 which is 41.8% of 2000.
Group 5, 2001, Total value of 21.41.
Item 1, Conservation value of 2.18 which is 10.2% of 2001.
Item 2, Disaster value of 8.67 which is 40.5% of 2001.
Item 3, Commodity value of 10.56 which is 49.3% of 2001.
Group 6, 2002, Total value of 12.53.
Item 1, Conservation value of 2.59 which is 20.7% of 2002.
Item 2, Disaster value of 0.44 which is 3.5% of 2002.
Item 3, Commodity value of 9.5 which is 75.8% of 2002.
Group 7, 2003, Total value of 12.57.
Item 1, Conservation value of 2.91 which is 23.2% of 2003.
Item 2, Disaster value of 2.52 which is 20.0% of 2003.
Item 3, Commodity value of 7.14 which is 56.8% of 2003.
Group 8, 2004, Total value of 11.14.
Item 1, Conservation value of 3.15 which is 28.3% of 2004.
Item 2, Disaster value of 1.06 which is 9.5% of 2004.
Item 3, Commodity value of 6.93 which is 62.2% of 2004.

back