USDA Economic Research Service Briefing Room
" "  
Link: Bypass USDA Left navigation.
Search ERS

Browse by Subject
Diet, Health & Safety
Farm Economy
Farm Practices & Management
Food & Nutrition Assistance
Food Sector
Natural Resources & Environment
Policy Topics
Research & Productivity
Rural Economy
Trade and International Markets
Also Browse By


or

""

 


 
Briefing Rooms

Farm Structure: Questions and Answers

Q. How has farmers' use of rented land changed over time?

A. Farming operations need access to land in order to produce agricultural products. Access may be obtained through renting as well as through outright ownership, and the share of farmland that is rented has changed over time. Farm operators leased 41 percent of total farmland in 1997, down slightly from 1992 (43 percent), but higher than in most census years since the turn of the century, except during the Great Depression.

In 1997, 29 percent of rented land was leased to tenants (who rent all the land they farm) and 71 percent was leased to part owners (who own some of the land they operate, but also rent additional land). Earlier in the century, the percentages were reversed. In 1900, for example, about 73 percent of rented land was leased to tenants, and 27 percent was rented to part owners.

Leased farmland as a percentage of total farmland, 1900-1997

Leasing land was traditionally viewed as the bottom rung of the tenure ladder. Young farmers would begin their careers by leasing all their land, often from relatives. As they grew older, they would buy some land, but continue to rent. The oldest farmers would cut back on farming by no longer leasing and concentrate on the land they owned (Hoppe et al., 1995; Wunderlich, 1994).

Renting land has changed from a method of entering into farming to a way of controlling additional land. Farms may rent land to avoid debt and risks of ownership (Reimund and Gale, 1992; Wiebe et al., 1997) and to enable rapid response to changing markets. Pinpointing when this shift occurred is difficult, but it was probably underway by the 1950s. Until then, farm tenancy was considered a serious social problem, particularly in the Southeast, and full ownership was viewed as the ideal form of tenure (Janssen, 1993).

Removing this stigma from renting enabled farmers to absorb the land of exiting operators without actually buying it. Most of the decline in farms was accounted for by full owners and tenants, with the decline in tenants beginning in 1935, about 10 years earlier than that in full owners. Part owners' share of land in farms increased from 36 percent in 1950 to 55 percent by 1997.

Number of farms by tenure, 1910-1997

References

Hoppe, Bob, Bob Green, and Gene Wunderlich. "Farmland Rentals: Central to Farming," Agricultural Outlook. AO-220. U.S. Dept. Agr., Econ. Res. Serv. July 1995.

Janssen, Larry. "Empirical Analysis of Tenure Patterns and Farm Structure," Size, Structure, and the Changing Face of American Agriculture. Arne Hallam (ed.), Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1993.

Reimund, Donn A., and Fred Gale. Structural Change in the U.S. Farm Sector, 1974-87: 13th Annual Family Farm Report to Congress. AIB-647. U.S. Dept. Agr., Econ. Res. Serv., May 1992.

Wunderlich, Gene. "Landownership," Agricultural Resources and Environmental Indicators. Margot Anderson and Richard Magleby (eds.), AH-705, U.S. Dept. Agr., Econ. Res. Serv. Dec. 1994.

Wunderlich, Gene. "AREI Updates: Farmland Tenure." AREI Updates, No. 7. U.S. Dept. Agr., Econ. Res. Serv., 1995.

Wiebe, Keith, Roger Claassen, and Abebayehu Tegene. "Land Tenure," Agricultural Resources and Environmental Indicators, 1996-97. Margot Anderson and Richard Magleby (eds.) AH-712. U.S. Dept. Agr., Econ. Res. Serv., July 1997.

For more information, contact: Robert Hoppe

Web administration: webadmin@ers.usda.gov

Updated date: July 9, 2002