Simulated Effects of Changes to State and Federal Asset Eligibility Policies for the Food Stamp Program
By Karen Cunnyngham and James Ohls. ERS project representative: Kenneth Hanson
Contractor and Cooperator Report No. (CCR-49) 126 pp,
October 2008
This study uses a microsimulation model to assess the effect of changes to State-level Food Stamp Program (FSP) asset rules on household eligibility and on the benefits that eligible households would receive. The findings show that 7 percent of households eligible in 2006 were eligible only through expanded categorical eligibility rules that exempted the households from the standard Federal FSP asset rules and that 1 percent of eligible households were eligible because of State rules that counted fewer vehicle assets toward the asset limits. The number of eligible households would increase by about 3 percent if asset limits were raised by $2,000, by 22 percent if the asset test were eliminated, by 2 percent if retirement accounts were excluded, and by less than half of 1 percent if all vehicles were excluded. Eligibility across States varied widely, with 32 percent of households eligible in at least one State but not eligible in all States. The Food Stamp Program was renamed to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) in October 2008.
Disclaimer: This study was conducted by the Mathematica Policy Research,
Inc., under Research Contract No. 59-5000-6-0077 with the Economic Research Service. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of ERS or USDA.
Keywords: Food Stamp Program, Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, asset eligibility rules, asset eligibility policies, FANRP, ERS, USDA
In this report ... Chapters are
in Adobe Acrobat PDF format.
Updated date: October 31, 2008
|
