USDA Economic Research Service Data Sets
" " " "
2002 Farm Bill

ERS Analysis:
Water and Waste Disposal Programs

Contents
 
 

USDA's Rural Utility Service (RUS) finances rural water and waste disposal facilities through loans and grants. These and other water-related programs are included in the Rural Community Advancement Program.

Key Changes

The $590 million limit on annual authorizations for water and waste facility grants would be eliminated. This change allows appropriation levels to rise over current levels for existing programs.

Funding of $360 million is authorized from Commodity Credit Corporation for a one-time reduction in the backlog of qualified, pending applications for grants and loans for water and waste disposal and emergency community water assistance. This funding would help RUS programs administer to the growing list of communities seeking assistance.

A new program of Search Grants is authorized at $51 million per year to assist very small communities (under 3,000 population) in preparing feasibility and environmental studies required to meet water and waste environmental standards.

Summary of Provisions

The authorization for Search Grants covers fiscal years (FY) 2002-07. Before awarding Search Grants to communities, the State's rural development director would establish and consult with an Independent Citizens Council, and the State rural development director would also consult with the State's environmental protection director. Eligibility requires that the communities demonstrate inability to obtain sufficient funding from traditional sources to complete legally mandated feasibility or environmental studies.

Other newly authorized programs include the following:

  • Grants to nonprofits to capitalize revolving loans for water and waste disposal facilities are authorized at $30 million per year for FY 2002-07. The purpose is to provide financing for predevelopment costs and short-term costs for replacement of equipment, small-scale extension services, or other small capital projects not part of regular operations and maintenance activities.

  • Grants to nonprofit organizations to finance homeowners' water well systems are authorized at $10 million per year for FY 2003-07. To be eligible for assistance, individuals cannot have household incomes above the State nonmetropolitan median.

Programs reauthorized include the following:

  • Grants for water systems of rural and native villages in Alaska are authorized at $10 million per year for FY 2002-07.

  • Grants for Native American tribes are authorized for each fiscal year. This among includes $30 million for grants, plus $20 million in grants for Indian tribes as defined in section 4 of the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act, plus $30 million for loans.

  • A Rural Water Circuit Rider Program will provide technical assistance to rural communities and is authorized at $15 million per year, beginning in FY 2003 and continuing each fiscal year thereafter. RUS already funds a circuit rider program operated by the National Rural Water Association.

The Emergency and Imminent Community Water Assistance Program (formerly the Emergency Community Water Assistance Program) now allows grants to forestall imminent decline in water quality and quantity, as well as to meet emergency needs of water systems. Between 3 and 5 percent of the funds appropriated under section 306(a)(2) of the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act (7 U.S.C. 1926a) will be reserved for this program until July 1 of each year. In addition, the program is authorized to receive $35 million per year for FY 2003-07.

Another provision allows for the guarantee of bond-financed loans for water and waste disposal facilities in the event the Internal Revenue Service code is modified.

Economic Implications

Water and waste disposal systems play an important role in rural communities, not only in maintaining a healthy community and a clean environment but also in providing basic infrastructure required to develop economically. As more is known about water's relationship to health, greater investments are required to ensure a healthy community. However, the per-person cost of these public investments in water system improvements is relatively high in rural areas because these areas tend to have small systems that do not achieve economies of scale. In addition, rural communities tend to have lower incomes than urban communities, so they are less able to afford the investments required. Increased Federal funding of rural water systems should help to meet the growing public and private demands for safe and clean water in rural communities.

For More Information...

 

For more information, contact: Faqir Bagi

Web administration: webadmin@ers.usda.gov

Updated date: June 21, 2002