USDA Economic Research Service Briefing Room
" "  
Link: Bypass USDA Left navigation.
Search ERS

Browse by Subject
Diet, Health & Safety
Farm Economy
Farm Practices & Management
Food & Nutrition Assistance
Food Sector
Natural Resources & Environment
Policy Topics
Research & Productivity
Rural Economy
Trade and International Markets
Also Browse By


or

""

 


 
Briefing Rooms

Rural Telecommunications: Demand for Service Delivery

Contents
 

Market considerations drive the adoption and diffusion of new communication and information technology. The diffusion process, however, is neither uniform nor continuous across regions, income groups, ethnic groups, and economic activities.

Rural and poor communities, in general, lag richer and urban areas in new telecommunication technology; the less returns a service provider is likely to reap in a location, the less likely they will invest in that location. The Communications Act of 1934 and subsequent laws and provisions, including the Telecommunications Act of 1996, have sought to address this through what are called universal service provisions (see the Rural Telecommunication Policy chapter).

Business and entrepreneurial demand for telecommunication services varies by type of economic activity. This demand exhibits one of the Catch-22s with respect to communication and information technology for rural areas: demand must exist to spur private investment in technology, but the technology must be in place to spur demand. The demand for communication and information services by the private sector comes from a number of economic factors:

  • "Lone Eagles" are individuals who are able to conduct private consulting, investment activity, and other business pursuits from any location. While their numbers are small in rural communities, they tend to have high incomes and are sought by many communities. For rural areas, they are most common in locations where good communication and information infrastructure exists, such as telecommunication equipment able to handle high volumes of data transmission.
  • Telecenters, telecottages, telecommuting, and other trends show some promise for rural areas, but again their numbers are small in rural areas. In the national economy, telework has been a slow but growing upward trend. On any given day approximately 2-3 percent of the U.S. workforce telecommute (2004). Approximately 16 percent of all workers worked at home some of the time during 2002.
  • New markets for existing rural businesses, including farms, also hold some promise. Niche markets, such as organic farm goods, is one such sector. The use of the Internet, at some point in the future, may become a necessary condition for continued business activity.
  • Telecommunication-dependent firms tend to cluster in telecommunication service-rich urban areas. Nevertheless, some telecommunication-dependent firms, such as catalog retail operations, do function in rural communities, but only those with sufficient communication and information infrastructure.

The Internet has developed into a robust channel for commerce, with transactions increasingly taking place on it. Annual U.S. Internet commerce (e-commerce) exceeds $1 trillion. Manufacturer’s e-commerce shipments in 2003 were $843 billion, 18 percent of all manufacturer shipments. Food, beverage, and tobacco manufacturer shipments were $107 billion, 21 percent of manufacturer e-commerce shipments. Retail sales, including expenditures for travel, on the Internet were $143 billion in 2005.

Businesses, consumers, and governmental entities have garnered economic gains from the Internet. The Internet offers small- and medium-sized firms some of the advantages that large firms have long held. It increases their access to information and can make it easier to get into additional markets, be they regional, national, or international. Large firms have reaped gains from using the Internet. Some large firms, for example, had been using dedicated electronic-data-interchange (EDI) systems for years to communicate with primary suppliers. Moving their EDI system over to the Internet helped reduce their overhead and potentially opened their system to more suppliers.

Consumers have also been reaping some economic benefits from the Internet. A great deal of information is readily available covering a range of interests or concerns, from government programs and consumer products to the most trivial of facts and fiction. Information overload was one problem that surfaced early for Internet users. Search engines, such as Google, however, have been developed to address this challenge through their capabilities in narrowing the focus of information searches.

Federal, State, and local governments have gained by the reduction in cost-of-service delivery to their constituents. Government grant and loan programs have increasingly occurred through the Internet. Various governments and government associated organizations distribute information through the Internet with cost saving relative to mail distribution and contributing to the critical mass needed to bring advanced telecommunication services to rural communities. Extension agent offices, for example, become customers for service providers. The more customers, and potential customers, that a service provider can address, the more profitable a location.

 

For more information, contact: Peter L. Stenberg

Web administration: webadmin@ers.usda.gov

Updated date: February 9, 2006