USDA Economic Research Service Briefing Room
" "  
Link: Bypass USDA Left navigation.
Search ERS

Browse by Subject
Diet, Health & Safety
Farm Economy
Farm Practices & Management
Food & Nutrition Assistance
Food Sector
Natural Resources & Environment
Policy Topics
Research & Productivity
Rural Economy
Trade and International Markets
Also Browse By


or

""

 


 
Briefing Rooms

India: Policy

Contents
 

Agricultural Policy
Agricultural Trade Policy
More Information

Agricultural Policy

Since independence, India has pursued a policy of food self-sufficiency, primarily by boosting domestic production of rice and wheat—the two food staples. This basic goal has been achieved by boosting rice and wheat yields through development and adoption of high-yielding varieties, expanding irrigation, and increasing fertilizer use. Cropped area has also increased steadily as expansion in irrigation has boosted multiple cropping and cropping intensity. Policies and performance for other crops have been mixed. For pulses (chickpeas, pigeon peas, lentils, dry peas, etc.), an important protein source in Indian diets, there has been little success in boosting output, and India has pursued a liberal import policy since the early 1980s. In the oilseed sector, generally high levels of protection for oilseeds and oils have not yielded significant gains in output. As a result, India is now among the world’s largest importers of edible oils, while Indian consumers pay among the highest prices in the world. In cotton, prior to a relatively recent reform, producers were heavily taxed by export controls aimed at assuring adequate and low-cost cotton supplies for country’s textile industry.

India’s major domestic agricultural policy instruments include a system of minimum support prices for major crops; input subsidies for fertilizer, power, and irrigation water; and public investments in surface-, and to a lesser extent, groundwater irrigation. Following the removal of quantitative trade restrictions, these instruments are now accompanied by relatively high bound and applied tariffs on most major commodities. For rice and wheat, the central and state governments procure supplies from the domestic market at support prices in order to maintain buffer stocks and assure adequate supplies for distribution at subsidized prices through the Public Distribution System (PDS) and other food distribution programs. The cost of these government rice and wheat operations, known as the “food subsidy,” along with the power subsidy, are generally the largest budget subsidy outlays for agriculture. Overall, budget outlays on agricultural subsidies, and, particularly, the food subsidy, have risen sharply in recent years, reaching about $12 billion in 2002/03.

India: Agricultural subsidies

Although the central government plays an important role in recommending national agricultural policies and is the primary source of funds, agriculture is a “state subject” in the Indian constitution. As a result, all agricultural policies—including price supports, input subsidies, produce marketing, and consumer subsidies—must ultimately be agreed to, and implemented, by state governments. The support of India’s various states, which reflect a broad range of resource endowments, is a key issue in reaching consensus on agricultural policy and in policy implementation.

In 1991-93, India introduced major reforms to industrial, trade, and exchange-rate policy. The growth these reforms have generated in other areas of the economy is creating increasing pressure for change in agricultural policy. Food demand is expanding and diversifying, which, in turn, is placing new demands on market infrastructure and institutions. Longstanding production, procurement, and distribution programs that focus on cereals are increasingly expensive and out of step with market demand. At the same time, rising subsidy outlays appear to be constraining public investment in transforming institutions and market infrastructure. And, despite improved growth in the overall economy, growth in farm output and, particularly, rural employment, is slowing.

There have been some important changes in agricultural policy since the early 1990s, including removal of quantitative trade restrictions that was completed in 2001, and initial steps to pare down regulation of domestic markets. National elections in 2004 sharpened the focus on the performance of agriculture and the necessity of reform, but policymakers are still seeking consensus on specific and fundamental reforms.

Top of page

Agricultural Trade Policy

From independence in 1947 until the early 1990s, India maintained strong control over imports and exports of both agricultural and nonagricultural goods, making India one of the most closed economies in the world. During this period, India's domestic markets were insulated from world markets by various restrictive practices, including bans, licensing regimes, state trading, and other quantitative restrictions, as well as high tariffs.

Although reforms began cautiously in the 1980s, India introduced fundamental reform of domestic and trade policies in 1991-93. Trade reforms implemented during this period were aimed at eliminating restrictive licensing arrangements and reducing other quantitative restrictions on imports and exports, and substantially reducing basic tariffs.

In a major policy shift, import licensing for all products—except those on the banned, restricted, and state monopoly lists—was abolished so that any item not on the lists could be freely imported. The lists, which included mainly agricultural products, consumer goods, and textiles, were revised and shortened annually.

Maximum tariff rates were brought down in steps from 300 percent to about 40 percent for most products, and countervailing duties were reduced. The average trade-weighted tariffs were reduced from 87 percent in 1991 to 27 percent in 1997. Trade restrictions on agricultural products were left mostly untouched in the 1991 reform, but subsequent trade policy changes gradually lifted restrictions on agricultural products.

  • State trading activities, once the bastion of full governmental control over agricultural trade, have been curtailed in almost all products.
  • Market access has been extended to agricultural products by relaxing licensing arrangements, reducing tariffs, freeing more items from quantitative restrictions, and allowing the private sector to import food items.
  • The private sector may import oilseeds and edible oils, and private millers may import wheat and corn on certain conditions.

In the Uruguay Round Agreement on Agriculture (URAA), India agreed to bind agricultural tariffs at ceiling rates ranging from 0 to 100 percent for primary products, 150 percent for processed products, and 300 percent for edible oils. In 1997, after India lost the balance-of-payments waiver that allowed it to maintain restrictive trade policies, India accelerated the process of lifting quantitative import restrictions (QRs). In April 2001, India completed the removal of QRs on agricultural imports and nearly all items can now be imported subject to a tariff and to sanitary and phytosanitary standards. In fiscal year 2002/03, while the average bound tariff for agricultural goods was a relatively high 115 percent, the average applied rate was 33 percent.

India’s agricultural trade policy also provides incentives for exports through various mechanisms:

  • Import duties are reduced for items needed by a processing industry if the processed products will be exported.
  • Firms are permitted to set up private bonded warehouses in domestic tariff areas to import, stock, and even sell restricted list items to holders of advance licenses.
  • Export restrictions on most products have been lifted, and some commodities are provided subsidies allowed by the World Trade Organization on domestic transport and marketing costs.
  • Agro-processing zones are being set up with government support for infrastructure and finance, as well as concessional duties for imported inputs for exported products.

Top of page

More Information

Additional information on India’s agricultural and agricultural trade policies are available from:

 

For more information, contact: Maurice R. Landes or Suresh Persaud

Web administration: webadmin@ers.usda.gov

Updated date: March 22, 2005