U.S. Food Marketing System
Structural Change
Five
reports address structural change and emerging trade practices in produce
markets:
- Understanding the Dynamics of Produce
Markets: Consumption and Consolidation Grow—describes changing produce markets and market channels, per capita consumption and retail sales trends (including value-added produce), and retail consolidation trends between 1987 and 1997.
- U.S. Fresh Fruit and
Vegetable Marketing: Emerging Trade Practices, Trends, and Issues—presents the results of interviews with produce grower-shippers and retail produce buyers. Two case studies provide additional analysis of the produce items selected for analysis:
- Competition in Fresh Produce
Markets: An Empirical Analysis of Channel Performance—Timothy
Richards and Paul Patterson, Arizona State University, tested for
retail
market power for Washington Red Delicious apples, California fresh
grapes, California fresh oranges, and Florida fresh grapefruit.
- Grocery Retailer Behavior
in the Procurement and Sale of Perishable Fresh Produce Commodities—Richard Sexton and others at the University of California-Davis examined supermarket retailers' pricing behavior for iceberg lettuce shipped from California and Arizona, mature-green tomatoes shipped from Florida and California, vine-ripe tomatoes shipped from California, and iceberg-blend fresh salads for 20 retailer supermarkets in 6 markets in 2003.

- U.S. Fresh Produce Markets:
Marketing Channels, Trade Practices, and Retail Pricing Behavior—provides a synthesis of the first two
ERS reports
and
two additional empirical studies of supplier-to-consumer price
margins by researchers at the University of California-Davis and
Arizona State
University.
Several summary articles of project reports have also been published:
Structural Change in the Meat, Poultry, Dairy, and Grain Processing Industries—From 1972 to 1992, consolidation and structural change in meat packing, meat processing, poultry slaughter and processing, cheese products, fluid milk, flour milling, corn milling, feed, and soybean processing transformed each industry. Plant size and output per employee rose sharply in all industries, suggesting that technological change was the major driving force. Communities and workers were affected as the number of plants declined by about one-third and the number of employees needed to staff the remaining plants dropped by more than 100,000 (20 percent) in eight industries. The number of plants in poultry slaughter and processing also dropped, but additional jobs were created.
Structural Change in U.S. Chicken and Turkey
Slaughter—Due to substantial
scale economies in poultry slaughter, the share of production held
by plants with more than 400 employees rose from less than 30 percent in
1972 to more
than 80 percent by 1992. Further consolidation may be limited by environmental
concerns associated with poultry production.
Consolidation in U.S. Meatpacking—Today, the four largest firms
handle 80 percent of all cattle slaughter. This report summarizes changes
in concentration in meatpacking and identifies scale economies, price
competition, and slow demand growth as important causes.
Vertical Coordination in the Pork and Poultry Industries
Vertical Coordination of Marketing
Systems: Lessons From the Poultry, Egg, and Pork Industries—The report examines the role of
contracts and vertical integration in reducing transaction costs.
The report
further explores benefits from new methods of vertical coordination
and the implications for future research.
Vertical Coordination in the Pork
and Broiler Industries: Implications for Pork and Chicken Products—New methods of organizing production
in the broiler industries led to lower costs, more production,
lower retail prices, and more uniform quality. Similar developments
have
occurred in the pork industry, where a need for more quality improvement
may lead to further vertical coordination.
Other Articles and Research Reports
The Impact of Big-Box Stores on Retail Food Prices and the CPI—This report focuses on retail food market dynamics and how they affect food price variation across store formats. Since the current CPI for food does not fully take into account the lower price option of nontraditional retailers, a gap exists between price changes as measured using scanner data versus the CPI estimate, even for the relatively low food inflation period of 1998-2003. This study estimates that the CPI for dairy products overstates food price change by 0.5 to 2.5 percentage points per year for dairy, eggs, and butter/margarine.
Let’s Eat Out: Americans Weigh Taste, Convenience, and Nutrition—Whether eating out or buying carryout, Americans are consuming more and more of their calories from full-service and fast-food restaurants. Analysis of a survey of U.S. consumers indicates that respondents want convenience and an enjoyable dining experience, but the desire for healthy food also plays a role.
How Low Has the Farm Share of Retail Food Prices Really Fallen?—Farmers are capturing more of the consumer's food dollar than previously estimated. Based on updated baskets of food representing what American households bought for at-home consumption between 1999 and 2003, this report estimates farm contribution of retail food prices for two major commodity groups—fresh fruits and vegetables.
From
Supply Push to Demand Pull: Agribusiness Strategies for Today’s
Consumers—This feature article in ERS’s magazine, Amber
Waves, looks at the evolution of agribusiness.
Food Manufacturing Productivity
and Its Economic Implications—The
gross-output multifactor productivity index for U.S. food manufacturing
grew 0.19 percent per year between 1975 and 1997. Although productivity
growth for food manufacturing has been relatively low, output
has grown 1.88 percent annually over the last two decades. Indeed,
the expansion of combined factor inputs encouraged food manufacturing
output. For a short summary of the report, see the related ERS
Research Brief.
Taxing Snack Foods:
What to Expect for Diet and Tax Revenues —This
Current Issues in Economics of Food Markets edition examines
the potential impact of excise taxes on snack foods. Such taxes
have been proposed by health policy advocates as a possible way
to address the growing prevalence of obesity and overweight in
the United States. Using scanner data, the study found that relatively
low tax rates of 1 cent per pound and 1 percent of value would
not appreciably alter consumption—and, thus, have little
effect on diet quality—but would generate $40-$100 million
in tax revenues.
|