USDA Economic Research Service Briefing Room
" "  
Search ERS

 
Briefing Rooms

Print this page Print | E-mail this link E-mail | Bookmark & Share Bookmark/share | Translate this page Translate | Text only Text only | resize text smallresize text mediumresize text large

Food Marketing System in the U.S.: New Product Introductions

Contents
 

New U.S. food and beverage product introductions in retail outlets, as tracked by Datamonitor, have followed an upward trend since the early 1990s, exceeding those of nonfood grocery items. In response to competition from Wal-Mart and other nontraditional foodstores, supermarkets have increased their product choices.

 
Chart icon Download and save this image
Excel icon Download an excel file with these data

In 2009, however, the number of new food and beverage products in retail outlets fell to 19,047, from 22,566 in 2008 and 24,236 in 2007, falling below the trend in nonfood grocery items. This decline marked the first consecutive year-to-year reduction in new food product introductions since 2002, and only the third since 1993. As credit conditions have tightened, retailers have found that eliminating certain products could increase sales and profits, due in part to reducing inventories. In addition, the recession has prompted consumers to seek familiar products and avoid impulse buying. To appeal to bargain-seeking customers who want to simplify their shopping trips as well as purchase familiar products, retailers are reducing the number of products introduced. In response, some manufacturers are reducing their product lines.

Table 1—New food and beverage product introductions, 2006-2009
 

2006

2007

2008

2009
Total
New products
20,228
24,236

22,566

19,047
 
Type of product
Percent of total

Candy, gum, and snacks

29.7

29.3

26.6

25.5

Beverages

24.7

18.9

23.1

21.3

Condiments

7.5

11.2

8.7

9.7

Processed meat

7.9

8.7

8.5

7.2

Meals and entrees

5.3

6.4

6.6

6.7

Fruit and vegetables

5.1

4.9

5.1

6.5

Dairy

5.4

4.8

4.7

4.8

Bakery foods

3.7

3.5

3.9

4.5

Pasta and rice

3.1

3.8

4.0

4.2

Baking ingredients

3.3

3.4

3.6

3.0

Cereals

1.8

1.7

1.6

1.8

Desserts

0.9

1.1

0.9

1.6

Baby food

0.4

1.0

1.0

1.3

Soups

0.9

0.9

0.8

1.0

Meal replacements and special diet foods

0.3

0.4

0.3

0.4

 
Source: Datamonitor.

In 2009, food categories with the largest shares of overall new product introductions include candy, gum, and snacks; beverages; condiments; and processed meat. However, the share of new candy, gum, and snack products introduced dropped from 2007 to 2009, as did the share of new condiments and processed meat.

Advertisements touting a product’s attributes are conveyed on packages and in supporting literature. Based on new product tags or claims (such as “organic”) tracked by Datamonitor, over 100 U.S. food and beverage new product claims or tags were identified in 2009. Health and convenience-related attributes accounted for 8 of the top 10 subject categories for ads on packages, and one-third of all new product claims. Five categories, including “natural,” “organic,” “single serving,” “quick,” and “fresh,” have ranked among the top 10 claims in every year since 2001. 

Table 2—Number of new product introductions in the top 10 product claim categories for 2002 to 20091

Tag or claim2

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

 
Number

Premium

905

1,589

1,568

2,106

2,645

3,552

3,362

2,336

Natural

1,245

1,380

1,364

1,612

1,664

2,335

2,123

1,894

Single serving

1,119

1,127

1,111

1,277

1,399

1,553

1,523

1,344

Private label

292

428

275

290

414

734

743

810

Fresh

578

556

599

692

700

952

918

799

Organic

443

559

533

670

738

1,110

1,042

775

No preservatives

421

578

551

550

586

850

807

758

Quick

443

521

511

571

651

790

656

597

Low or no trans fat

17

64

238

455

535

754

664

572

High-vitamin

422

483

509

532

556

647

725

558

Total new product claims

13,769

16,374

17,922

19,544

20,459

26,263

25,012

22,483

 
 
Percent of total

Premium

6.6

9.7

8.7

10.8

12.9

13.5

13.4

10.4

Natural

9.0

8.4

7.6

8.2

8.1

8.9

8.5

8.4

Single serving

8.1

6.9

6.2

6.5

6.8

5.9

6.1

6.0

Private label

2.1

2.6

1.6

1.5

2.0

2.8

3.0

3.6

Fresh

4.2

3.4

3.3

3.5

3.4

3.6

3.7

3.6

Organic

3.2

3.4

3.0

3.4

3.6

4.2

4.2

3.4

No preservatives

3.1

3.5

3.1

2.8

2.9

3.2

3.2

3.4

Quick

3.2

3.2

2.9

2.9

3.2

3.0

2.6

2.7

Low or no trans fat

0.1

0.4

1.4

2.4

2.6

2.9

2.7

2.5

High-vitamin

3.1

2.9

2.8

2.7

2.7

2.5

2.9

2.5

 

1Does not include associated stock keeping units (SKUs, or variations in size and form).  According to Datamonitor, the SKU count report may produce erroneous results because a single new product introduction can have multiple SKUs, and each of these SKUs may or may not have certain package tags.

2A new product may have multiple tags or claims.

Source: Datamonitor.

In 2007, the number of “low or no trans fat” claims surpassed that of “low or no fat” for the first time. A Federal law requiring manufacturers to list trans-fat on food labels by 2006 sparked reformulation of products to reduce trans-fats. In 2009, 572 “no- or low-trans-fat” products were introduced, compared with 238 in 2004, 64 in 2003, and 17 in 2002.

Private-label products, or store brands, also cracked the top 10 claims for the first time in 2007, an increase of over 75 percent compared with 2006. In 2009, store brands ranked fourth among product claims, accounting for 3.6 percent of new product launches. As retailers have become more adept at creating profitable store brands, these brands have expanded at a faster pace than costlier national brands. More consumers are turning toward private-label foods in the face of the economic downturn and higher gas prices. Demand has also risen due to other factors, such as increasing food-price inflation and the marketing efforts of retailers. Profit margins of store-brand items are, on average, 10 percentage points higher than those of national brands. Store brands can also add to retailers’ individuality by offering something new and different, as products are limited to their respective stores. 

 

For more information, contact: Stephen Martinez

Web administration: webadmin@ers.usda.gov

Updated date: May 21, 2010