USDA Economic Research Service Briefing Room
" "  
Link: Bypass USDA Left navigation.
Search ERS

Browse by Subject
Diet, Health & Safety
Farm Economy
Farm Practices & Management
Food & Nutrition Assistance
Food Sector
Natural Resources & Environment
Policy Topics
Research & Productivity
Rural Economy
Trade and International Markets
Also Browse By


or

""

 


 
Briefing Rooms

Agricultural Research and Productivity: Questions and Answers

Q. What are the benefits of joint public-private research?

A. Joint public-private research is one way that USDA inventions are brought to the marketplace. USDA researchers are spared the development work needed to prepare these technologies for commercialization. Private companies and consumers gain access to a new technology, while USDA researchers can focus on research that benefits more people and in other areas.

USDA Technology Transfer Activities

Public-private collaborations offer firms and research institutions valuable USDA information, either about a particular technology or line of development or else scientific expertise that differs from that of the private sector and academia. Even if the research does not result in a marketable product, the results of these efforts can instruct companies on technology opportunities and the development process. Likewise, collaborations inform government scientists as to industry needs, and USDA also benefits through shared license fees and royalties.

Joint public-private research helps reduce the costs to the developers and users of agricultural technologies. Many technologies cannot be developed without major investment (as for production scale-up and market development). Unless a company is assured that the returns to R&D will exceed its cost, a technology may not be developed, even if the potential payoff is high. By reducing research costs and (sometimes) providing the opportunity for exclusive rights, joint research allows companies to explore a broader range of alternatives for development.

Similarly, a technology may provide large social benefits, but the investment required to commercialize the technology may exceed its return. In these cases, technology transfer by the government can offer the support necessary to explore research that has social benefits, but which may be risky, or may not have sufficient private returns. A new technology that is more environmentally benign than an existing technology, such as the postharvest biofungicide BIO-SAVE 11, which uses bacteria to fight storage rots on apples, pears, and citrus is one such example. It can reduce fruit losses from decay while decreasing grower reliance on chemical fungicides.

See Agricultural Technology Development in Agricultural Resources and Environmental Indicators.

 

For more information, contact: Kelly Day-Rubenstein

Web administration: webadmin@ers.usda.gov

Updated date: April 30, 2002