Amber Waves cover, May 2007
Amber Waves: The Economics of Food, Farming, Natural Resources, and Rural America

May 2007

| United States Department of Agriculture | Economic Research Service
Search   GO!  
Current Issue
All Issues
  Amber Waves Home
spacer Up Front
  Feature Articles

Findings

Statistics
  Additional Readings
  About Amber Waves
  E-mail notices

Farm Bill Resources

ERS Newsroom

 

USDA's Economic Research Service

Ad: Print Edition
Click here to subscribe to Amber Waves
Read more about our awards

 

 


Originally published Vol. 3, Issue 3 (June 2005)—updated May 2007

U.S. Fruit and Vegetable Imports Outpace Exports

Photo:  Man moving boxes of bananas
The U.S., traditionally a net exporter of fruits and vegetables, has become a large net importer, with imports more than doubling between 1996 and 2006 to reach $15.4 billion. U.S. exports of fruits and vegetables have also risen but less rapidly, reaching $12.2 billion in 2006. The surge in imports can be traced to a growing consumer demand for produce from tropical regions, produce that complements U.S. seasonal patterns of production, and produce that competes directly with U.S. production. Because of geographic proximity and low or zero tariffs, Canada and Mexico are among the largest sources and destinations of U.S. trade of fruits and vegetables.

U.S. produce exports are growing more slowly than imports partly because they are constrained by high tariffs and slow economic growth in importing countries. The global average tariff for the fruit and vegetable sector is over 50 percent, with tariffs varying substantially across products and countries. In general, the United States maintains lower tariffs than most of its trading partners. Nearly 60 percent of U.S. tariffs on produce are less than 5 percent, and over 90 percent are under 25 percent. Countries belonging to the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), which together import about 85 percent of the value of world fruit and vegetable trade, are characterized by a relatively large number of low tariffs and a small number of very high tariffs. For example, most Japanese and European Union fruit and vegetable tariffs range from 5 to 25 percent. In contrast, over half of all official tariffs of non-OECD countries exceed 25 percent, although in practice, non-OECD developing countries tend to maintain lower tariffs.

Chart: Nearly 60 percent of U.S. tariffs on produce are less than 5 percent

Market forces and government policies also are key factors shaping U.S. fruit and vegetable trade. The recent decline in the dollar—down about 13.4 percent in real terms since 2002 against a basket of horticultural trading partners—has made American fruits and vegetables relatively less expensive than those of most U.S. competitors in importing countries. The main exception is China, which has maintained a fixed exchange rate with the dollar, and China’s horticultural products have begun to compete head-on with U.S. products in important third-country markets such as Japan. Partly in response to growing international competition, in December 2004, Congress passed the Specialty Crops Competitiveness Act, which (although largely not funded) authorizes promotional campaigns and technical and financial assistance designed to enhance the competitiveness of U.S. fruits and vegetables. Additionally, ongoing World Trade Organization negotiations, as well as regional and bilateral trade agreements, may lead to reductions in tariff and nontariff measures faced by U.S. fruit and vegetable growers in global markets.

This finding is drawn from. . .

Trade Issues Facing U.S. Horticulture in the WTO Negotiations, by Jason Donovan and Barry Krissoff, VGS-285-01, USDA, Economic Research Service, August 2001.

Global Trade Patterns in Fruits and Vegetables, edited by Sophia Wu Huang, WRS-04-06, USDA, Economic Research Service, June 2004.

You may also be interested in. . .

ERS Briefing Rooms on:

Fruit and Tree Nuts

Vegetables and Melons

Global Food Markets


printer iconPrinter-friendly format Download PDF version Email this page